Jackson County committee holds ordinance that would require officials to reimburse special-election costs

5872217 · August 4, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted to hold Ordinance 5997, which would require elected officials to reimburse special-election costs if a court finds they improperly denied certified recall petitions; members asked for legal opinions on authority to impose such reimbursement.

The Intergovernmental Affairs Committee voted to hold Ordinance 5997, a proposal to require elected officials to reimburse special-election costs if a court determines there was an improper denial of voter-certified recall efforts.

A committee member said the ordinance language was drafted in opposition to the general counsel’s office and asked staff to clarify legal authority for what the draft calls "financial accountability." A staff speaker responding to the question said he could not identify where the county legislature would have authority to add a requirement for reimbursement tied to a court order. "I couldn't figure out where the authority of the legislator would be to add a, like you said, retribution, whatever, to a court order," the staff speaker said.

Committee members proposed seeking a written opinion from the counselor's office and possibly outside counsel on what the county could lawfully require. The committee then moved and seconded to hold the ordinance pending legal review; members voted in the affirmative and no opposition was recorded on the committee floor.

The committee did not adopt the ordinance, amend its language, or set a timeline for the outside opinion during the meeting; it instead directed that additional legal analysis be obtained before the item returns to committee.