Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

United ISD authorizes counsel to proceed on Potential Holdings LLC land-plats lawsuit

September 18, 2025 | UNITED ISD, School Districts, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

United ISD authorizes counsel to proceed on Potential Holdings LLC land-plats lawsuit
The United Independent School District Board of Trustees voted in open session to authorize district counsel to proceed regarding litigation filed by Potential Holdings LLC concerning plats and property within the district.

The lawsuit, described in the meeting record as Potential Holdings LLC v. United Independent School District, concerns the UISD Student Activity Complex Educational Support Center plat and the UISD Las Cruces School plat recorded in Webb County plat records. The board’s public excerpt cites the case as filed in the 111th Judicial District Court of Webb County under case number 2023-cv-000151-D2.

Board members announced they had discussed the matter in closed session under the Texas Government Code sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074 and 551.076; the open-session motion directed counsel to proceed "as discussed in closed session." A motion and second were recorded and the motion passed by voice vote; no trustee registered opposition in the excerpt.

Why it matters: Plat and property disputes can affect district capital projects, land use and the timeline for planned school facilities. Authorizing counsel to proceed is a formal legal decision that signals the district will follow the litigation path outlined in closed session.

What the meeting record shows: The board convened in closed session under the cited Government Code sections, then returned to open session and authorized counsel to take the legal steps discussed in closed session. Specific litigation strategy details were not disclosed in open session as permitted by law.

Next steps: The authorization empowers district attorneys to pursue the legal options discussed; any substantive court filings or settlements would be recorded separately in court filings and future board minutes.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI