Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Staff weighs three rural reclassification requests; one recommended, one conditionally and one unresolved

September 23, 2025 | Kitsap County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Staff weighs three rural reclassification requests; one recommended, one conditionally and one unresolved
Kitsap County staff presented three reclassification requests that were carried forward into the Year of the Rural process. Each request asks to change the rural zoning designation for a parcel or parcels; staff used Kitsap County Code 21.08.070 review criteria to analyze the requests.

Summary of staff recommendations and notable details:
- Request A: Staff recommended approval to change from rural to rural commercial (staff noted the property was developed pre‑GMA and that surrounding uses include timber industry and a golf course). Staff recommended approval conditional on findings documented in the staff report.
- Request B: Request to rezone from rural residential to rural industrial; staff offered no recommendation in the packet and wrote that deliberation will require commission discussion. Staff flagged the parcel’s position on a state highway, ownership by the same party as adjacent parcels, creation of a potential zoning “island” to the north and an open code‑enforcement case on the adjacent land as factors requiring further scrutiny.
- Request C: Multi‑parcel request to change from rural protection to rural commercial. Staff proposed conditional approval that would exclude portions encumbered by critical areas and advised aggregation of parcels where possible to preserve buildable land; the northeastern parcel appears encumbered by critical areas.

Why it matters: Reclassification changes the set of allowed uses and can affect traffic, critical-area protections, and community character. Staff emphasized the need for the commission to deliberate carefully and noted that some applications may raise code‑enforcement and critical‑area issues that could affect outcome or be contested in appeals.

Process: Staff said the three requests were among 17 the county carried forward from the comprehensive-plan process and that earlier requests related to upzoning were removed in June. Staff said reclassification reports include maps, land-use context, and findings of fact in accordance with county code. The commission will deliberate on these requests during a scheduled October session.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI