Candidates urge limits on consumer fireworks in Medina, citing safety and density concerns
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Both candidates said Medina should tightly limit consumer fireworks after Ohio legalized certain fireworks statewide. They cited dense housing, fire risk and resident disturbance as reasons to keep local restrictions.
Both mayoral candidates said the city should restrict use of larger consumer fireworks and enforce safety rules within Medina limits.
John Coyne called for limiting fireworks to smaller, lower‑hazard classes and for prohibiting larger aerial displays on private property. "I don't have a problem people buying fireworks that are safer for smaller areas," Coyne said, adding that large aerial shells can start fires or cause injury.
Jim Shields said the city’s dense housing stock makes consumer fireworks unsafe and that enforcement of local rules should continue. "It's just not safe," Shields said, noting conversations with the fire chief and police chief about the hazard of private shows in dense neighborhoods. He said he generally supported the city's existing ban on private fireworks and would not favor broad exceptions.
Both candidates said certified professional displays remain an option for public celebrations and that residents who want a private display should consult the fire chief to explore legal, safer alternatives.
No change to local fireworks enforcement was announced at the forum.