Seabrook City Council approved a package of routine and single-item motions during its meeting, including consent minutes, board appointments, a multi-year auditing contract and two grant-authorizing resolutions.

Key votes at a glance:
- Consent agenda (item 3): Council approved minutes for the July 15 and July 22, 2025 meetings and took action on Resolution 2025-21 appointing the clerk of the municipal court of record. Motion to approve the consent agenda passed unanimously.
- Boards and commissions (item 4.1): Council approved the appointment of Tom Doolin and Tracy Powell to the Economic Development Corporation to fill unexpired terms. A council member raised concerns about process and the selection of a short-term resident over longer-term applicants; the motion to appoint passed with one recorded opposition (Council Member Cervantes) and otherwise carried.
- Bid award: RFQ 2025-9 professional auditing services (item 5.1): Council awarded an external financial audit contract to Whitley Penn LLP for fiscal years ending 09/30/2025–2028 with extension options; the motion carried unanimously after a council member announced a precautionary recusal from voting due to a client relationship (the member left the dais during the vote).
- Grant authorizations (items 6.4 and 6.5): Council approved two Houston Urban Area Security Initiative grant submissions to purchase ballistic helmets ($18,975) and cover management/administration ($998.68); both resolutions were approved unanimously.
- Strategic plan (item 6.6): Council formally accepted the 2025–26 strategic plan and directed quarterly updates; motion passed unanimously.

Why it matters: The items encompass personnel appointments, city financial oversight and grant-seeking for equipment; several items were routine but the EDC appointments generated public comment and internal council concern about selection process and transparency.

Details and notes: Council member discussion during the EDC appointments highlighted disagreement about candidate selection and interview process. For the auditing contract, one council member noted the awardee was a client of the member’s company and recused themselves from the vote to avoid any appearance of conflict.

Ending: All motions on the consent and routine panels passed by majority or unanimous vote where recorded; the council asked staff to follow up on process transparency for appointments.