Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Commission tables short-term rental application at 138 Wooded Lane pending management plan and local manager

October 08, 2025 | Warren County, Virginia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission tables short-term rental application at 138 Wooded Lane pending management plan and local manager
The Planning Commission on Oct. 8 tabled a conditional use permit application for a short-term tourist rental at 138 Wooded Lane and asked the applicant to submit a revised management plan and evidence of a local property manager before the commission considers it again.

Staff explained the house was built in 2024, has five bedrooms, and currently faces an active zoning violation for operating a short-term rental without a CUP. A health department operational permit allows a maximum of 10 occupants for the dwelling; staff noted the applicant is interviewing local property managers and recommended several conditions addressing health, building and fire-code compliance, annual well testing and septic maintenance requirements.

Several adjacent property owners spoke in opposition. Caroline Temesco read restrictive covenants for the Morgan Ridge subdivision that she said prohibit commercial activities and argued short-term rentals disrupt neighborhood character, increase traffic and trash, and threaten privacy. David York, Ron Tomecko and others echoed concerns about increased traffic on a gravel road, potential for parties and difficulty enforcing covenants; one commenter, acting as agent for a neighboring property owner, said the subdivision covenants were recorded and intended to preserve a family-oriented neighborhood.

Commissioners and staff discussed enforcement and management: staff confirmed the certificate of zoning requires approved health department records and that management plans typically must identify an on-call local manager; commissioners asked that the applicant secure a manager and revise the property management plan to address signage and misdirected guests before the item returns. The motion to table the item until a revised management plan and a property manager were in place passed unanimously.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Virginia articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI