Board approves consent calendar; pulls science-policy language and flags $2 million in purchase orders

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved the consent calendar with changes, removing board policy 6142.93 for further review and approving purchase orders that include roughly $2 million in charges—about half for special-education transportation via a joint powers agreement.

The Los Altos School District Board of Trustees on Thursday approved the consent calendar with two exceptions: board policy 6142.93 (science instruction) was pulled for further review, and one consent item was removed and will return at a later meeting.

During the consent discussion, a trustee questioned a purchase-order report showing about $2,000,000 in August purchases. District staff explained that roughly half that amount represented special-education transportation charges paid through a joint powers agreement with a regional transportation agency. "It's called Silicon Valley Joint Powers Transportation Agency for special education transportation," a staff member said, explaining that the district pays Santa Clara Unified (through the JPA) to provide routes and does a year-end “true up” for actual service delivered.

Board members also asked about a property and liability insurance premium. A staff member identified Northern California Mutual Insurance and said the premium is "almost $600,000 more" on the report and that joining a new JPA earlier this year should save the district about $200,000 while providing improved coverage.

Trustees moved and seconded approval of the consent calendar with the noted edits; the motion passed unanimously. The board also instructed staff to pull BP 6142.93 for language review after trustees raised concerns that a sentence in the policy—on causes, effects and methods to mitigate and adapt to climate change—might specify a particular scientific consensus and therefore warranted additional review.

No changes to spending authority were made at the meeting; staff said they will return with corrected policy language and the removed consent item at a future board meeting.