[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6427457,"mediaKeyId","5888284-1e14026f979dc57bcca877212b803f9f","parentId",5888284,"title","Council hears debate over Highlands Townhomes: turn‑lane length, parkland sale and stormwater detention","audioSeconds",268,"startMs",1268000,"endMs",1536000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5888284-1e14026f979dc57bcca877212b803f9f&start=1268&end=1536","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5888284-1e14026f979dc57bcca877212b803f9f/thumbnail_1268000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6427457/Lincoln/Lancaster-County/Nebraska/Council-hears-debate-over-Highlands-Townhomes-turnlane-length-parkland-sale-and-stormwater-detention","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6427457-bee11acc30bf96780aa10437753414d5/orig.mp4?Expires=1770571413&Signature=GFUE5Xz89Ya9KEgIfIokZS186EqiLYOXnqiLQH4BRC53EuqthqZQoS3xg5b8Iuu2I41MkmkJI2NEPw8RNJXGOaxf1L9JVHryq-0cV2lCqFoIjVP-5gAPfJI19AG4FHsT8IUa1Plr7h6QOkb8fxIymK3bJDWCy3vuP7~2yZADXUjF9kJO4F0suTcPIDpNsMtMT-piwfWksmMGvhx-ps7Alod5PGIIn6~YvkkP91Dx-3jDeejo8v5wlWaY93vrN39v82sxjEFpV8esT2LrwGsC4OszyCvPr8BUuGuTmIDnknS3irPdxoPXuuUf9KmMYOkkS1VUjrjbQYv0ojYjoqYydg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of Lincoln, NE","date","2025-10-06T19:46:55Z","article","Lincoln city staff and a developer clashed on Oct. 6 over traffic safety, cost and housing trade‑offs tied to a proposed 72‑unit multifamily project near Northwest Thirteenth Street and West Fletcher Avenue.

Elizabeth Elliott, director of Lincoln Transportation and Utilities (LTU), asked the council to deny a developer request to shorten required turning lanes on Fletcher Avenue. “Ultimately, our reason for denial is grounded in safety first,” Elliott said, explaining LTU’s access‑management standard calls for a 300‑foot turn lane on that arterial and that the city’s standard is supported by AASHTO guidance and federal crash‑reduction goals under the Safe Streets Lincoln initiative. Elliott told the council the developer’s requested reduction — roughly cutting the lane length to 155 feet — “does not meet the safety standards, and that would create an unsafe area where we would likely see many more rear end crashes and potentially serious, if not deadly crashes at a 45 mile an hour arterial zone.”

City planning and parks staff described related land actions that are part of the same package: a use permit to develop 3.45 acres into multifamily housing, comprehensive‑plan conformance for a small area of city‑owned land, a change‑of‑zone and a proposed real‑estate exchange in which Highlands Townhomes LLC would purchase about 0.7 acres of city parkland adjacent to Highlands Golf Course to construct a stormwater detention/water‑quality cell. Maggie Stokke Ross of Lincoln Parks and Recreation said the department supports the sale, calling the surplus area small, not used for active recreation and a maintenance burden. Jocelyn Goldin from the city law department said the city would receive about $30,000 for the parcel and that proceeds would go into the advanced land acquisition fund per city charter; the parks benefit, she said, is reduced maintenance obligations.

Developer representatives said gravity sewer limitations originally kept the parcel from being developed and that a pump‑station solution now makes multifamily feasible. Rick Onond of ENA Consulting and developer Bob Lewis said turning‑lane requirements are excessive for the specific, low‑volume use proposed and that shorter lanes would reduce development costs. Onond said traffic counts the team conducted on July 29 showed peak hour trips associated with the site of 521 eastbound and 99 westbound trips and that national guidance would require considerably higher trip thresholds (844 eastbound and 247 westbound) to justify a full turn lane as a cost‑effective measure. He said the developer’s proposed 155‑foot turn lanes would cost about $451,000; extending to the city’s 300‑foot standard would be about $687,000.

Council members pressed both sides on technical points including sight distance, roadway grade and how the project’s detention location affects unit count. Developer testimony said moving detention onto the golf course allowed the proposal to reach about 72 units; without off‑site detention the developer said unit count would be “probably half.” Council members asked about the sight distance analysis and the developer said a sight‑distance exhibit submitted to LTU “greatly exceeds what is required by national standards.” City staff countered that many federal benchmarks assume turn‑lane entry speeds near 35 mph; in this corridor, speeds commonly exceed the posted 45 mph and the approach includes a curve and a grade that factor into safety calculations.

Elliott said LTU negotiated two of three requested deviations with the developer and offered a compromise to shorten the lane by 50 feet, but that the remaining difference on the critical turning lane was significant enough that staff recommended denial. Council member questions clarified that a 50‑foot reduction would save roughly $46,000 compared with the full city standard; the developer said the reduced lane length and other cost savings support more affordable units.

No final council vote on the deviation or related land actions appears in the Oct. 6 transcript. The matter was presented in public hearing with staff recommendations, applicant rebuttal and public comment opportunities before the council; the record shows active technical exchange and multiple staff and applicant exhibits were referenced.

Why it matters: the decision will affect whether the project proceeds with the developer’s proposed access and detention arrangement, the city’s roadway safety posture on a 45‑mph arterial, and the disposition of a small parcel of parkland and the associated $30,000 advance‑land acquisition funds.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Lincoln City Council Meeting October 6, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","City staff recommended denying a developer’s appeal to shorten required turning lanes on Fletcher Avenue for a proposed 72‑unit multifamily project, citing safety and AASHTO guidance; the developer argued counts and costs justify a shorter lane and that moving detention onto adjacent golf‑course land enables higher density housing.","taxTitle","Lincoln, Lancaster County, Nebraska","taxId",2562,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6427465,"Lincoln City Council sets property tax levy for FY2025‑26, approves labor contract and multiple permits",270,745000,1015000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5888284-1e14026f979dc57bcca877212b803f9f&start=745&end=1015","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5888284-1e14026f979dc57bcca877212b803f9f/thumbnail_745000.jpg","/articles/6427465/Lincoln/Lancaster-County/Nebraska/Lincoln-City-Council-sets-property-tax-levy-for-FY202526-approves-labor-contract-and-multiple-permits","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6427465-6b2c1b3b405228e398120db4ba15a0ca/orig.mp4?Expires=1770571413&Signature=SIWg2QfzI3RxfFHHX0rHpCO2ZQbCvaFNA9wepkqxLhDLFa3X6xm2TfDwrOQ6vefCTGL3ncMMbPjAnhbKcjtAmr1pqQxNCUSlXRj~wqWIPX3XobG0XnzfncxgJODJrZvwUT1MT3RsmsIQhpWF6uHhyXQUCuaV0uPHhMEeiYwNu7pizUReh3PLkcpXC4~19BGGZrRZbYbGiZbdv7Z3txvmKKTOMv77o8MGcZmFH21Fkvrn6sDtmCyxmX0T0a4ubqeMO2k38bvOxiSBk0KJEPOHie7~jslLk08qBJ7lAitfkaxll8JOAOwUMrv9hn7Xk3~eFHCkup3JbnhYWekCapKOKQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Lincoln City Council on Oct. 6 set the property tax levy required to fund the city’s previously adopted fiscal year 2025‑26 budget and approved several routine items and agreements, voting unanimously where recorded.

Finance Director Joe Donlier told the council the action is a ministerial step to match the levy with the budget the council adopted in August. “The item in front of you today is setting the tax levy necessary to fund the fiscal year 2526 budget that council passed,” Donlier said, adding the levy includes the amount needed to repay a stormwater improvement bond approved by voters. The resolution produces a levy of 29.732 cents per $100 of assessed value, the staff presentation said.

The levy-setting vote, introduced by Councilmember Beckias and seconded by Councilmember Washington, passed on a 6‑0 roll call.

Why it matters: setting the levy is the ministerial step required by city code and state law to make the adopted biennial budget effective; without the levy adoption the budget would not be balanced on paper, staff explained.

Beyond the levy, the council moved several consent and ordinance items with little discussion. Highlights recorded on the docket and by roll call include:
- Reappointment of Emily Deaker and Christopher Walsh to the StarTran Advisory Board (term to expire 10/20/2028) — motion carried 6‑0.
- Approval of two on‑call professional services task order agreements for preliminary engineering and environmental services for the West South Street bridge over Salt Creek — motions carried 6‑0.
- Introduction and approval of several liquor license items: Cornhusker Bar and Grill (class I) with manager application for Saad Kodaida; Arbor Axe House (class A) with manager Connor Peterson — both approved; an application from Mill Global LLC (Milium Market) was withdrawn by the applicant and the withdrawal was approved 6‑0.
- Third‑reading ordinances: pay‑schedule adjustments for classifications prefixed by “P” were adopted 6‑0; the labor contract between the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Police Union (effective 08/14/2025 through 08/31/2028) was approved 6‑0.

Council procedure and legal context: Donlier cited Lincoln Municipal Code chapter 3.0607 and Nebraska Revised Statute chapter 77‑1633 when describing the levy action as ministerial. He reminded the public the council adopted a biennial budget in August and the current action aligns the levy rate with that adopted budget.

The meeting record shows no public opposition to the levy during the public hearing period and no amendments to the budget were proposed at the Oct. 6 session.

Looking ahead: council members stated no further debate was needed on these routine items; staff will proceed with implementation steps tied to the adopted budget and the approved contracts and licenses.

","The council set a property tax levy to fund the already-adopted FY2025‑26 budget and approved several routine items including a police union labor contract, pay-schedule adjustments, on-call engineering task orders and liquor license applications. All recorded votes carried unanimously.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council hears debate over Highlands Townhomes: turn‑lane length, parkland sale and stormwater detention

Lincoln City Council sets property tax levy for FY2025‑26, approves labor contract and multiple permits