Citizen Portal
Sign In

Article not found

This article is no longer available. But don't worry—we've gathered other articles that discuss the same topic.

Indelible Solutions praised for community engagement but committee cited quality control issues on prior action plan work
Indelible Solutions praised for community engagement but committee cited quality control issues on prior action plan work
ICF viewed as competent with strong local presence; reviewers want more construction and intake detail
ICF viewed as competent with strong local presence; reviewers want more construction and intake detail
Committee flags Elite Business Strategies for limited scale and unclear methodology
Committee flags Elite Business Strategies for limited scale and unclear methodology
Guidehouse proposal judged competent but reviewers want more detail on single‑family intake, LMI and infrastructure prioritization
Guidehouse proposal judged competent but reviewers want more detail on single‑family intake, LMI and infrastructure prioritization
Ernst & Young praised for methodology and past county partnership; committee saw some gaps in infrastructure and housing scale
Ernst & Young praised for methodology and past county partnership; committee saw some gaps in infrastructure and housing scale
Committee finds Tetra Tech solid on public assistance but notes gaps in single‑family housing and reporting tools
Committee finds Tetra Tech solid on public assistance but notes gaps in single‑family housing and reporting tools
Committee raises capacity and reference concerns about vendor 'Horn'
Committee raises capacity and reference concerns about vendor 'Horn'
Evaluation committee to interview all seven proposers, schedule orals and consider best-and-final offers
Evaluation committee to interview all seven proposers, schedule orals and consider best-and-final offers