The Leominster Planning Board convened on September 15, 2025, to address several key agenda items, including a request for withdrawal of an application and proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance regarding accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

The meeting began with a discussion on the parking area for a car dealership located at Map 206, Parcels 17 and 18. The applicant submitted a memo requesting to withdraw the application without prejudice. The board moved to close the hearing on this matter, with a motion made and seconded. The motion passed unanimously, allowing the board to proceed to the next item on the agenda.

The second significant item involved a public hearing regarding a petition from Lehi Eaton, the executive director of the Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission. The petition sought to amend the zoning ordinance to replace Article 15, which pertains to accessory apartments, with a new article that aligns with recently passed state law. Karen Chapman from the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission presented the updates, noting that the state law now allows accessory dwelling units by right.

Chapman explained that the city had requested a District Local Technical Assistance (DLTA) grant to develop a new ADU ordinance. The planning commission collaborated with a working group from city hall, including various departments, to craft the ordinance. Key highlights of the proposed changes include:

- One ADU is permitted by right on a lot with a principal residence, removing the special permit requirement.
- The ordinance allows ADUs in various forms, including within the principal structure, in an addition, or in new or existing outbuildings.
- New detached ADUs are restricted to side and rear yards, while additions can be located in the front yard.
- The requirement for owner occupancy has been eliminated, allowing any individual to occupy the ADU.
- The ordinance establishes a parking requirement of one space per ADU, with exceptions for properties near transit stations.

The proposed amendments were submitted to the city council, which opened a public hearing last week. The council recommended changes to clarify terminology, replacing "accessory apartment" with "accessory dwelling unit" throughout the ordinance.

The meeting concluded with a clear progression through the agenda, highlighting the board's commitment to updating local regulations in accordance with state laws and addressing community needs. Further discussions and decisions regarding the proposed amendments are expected in future meetings.