[{"_1":2,"_94":-5,"_95":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,84],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6006704,"mediaKeyId","5825043-16560ccce4abc13f647c226911d956d2","parentId",5825043,"title","Commissioners debate Cottonwood Hollow road status, private-road agreements and addressing rules","audioSeconds",237,"startMs",2505000,"endMs",2742000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825043-16560ccce4abc13f647c226911d956d2&start=2505&end=2742","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6006704/Jefferson-County/Idaho/Commissioners-debate-Cottonwood-Hollow-road-status-private-road-agreements-and-addressing-rules","mediaUrl","author","Jefferson County, ID","date","2025-09-08T00:00:00Z","article","County planning staff and commissioners examined a longstanding road question in Cottonwood Hollow and discussed broader private-road and addressing rules that can affect lot splits and access.

Staff presented a 1996 letter from subdivision representatives that asked the county to accept a portion of 4150 East as a county road if the developer provided a larger cul-de-sac and associated easements. The text of the letter, read into the record, said the subdivision had widened a cul-de-sac to 60 feet and asked the county to accept and maintain the road after two additional items were provided: an as-built plot showing the cul-de-sac and engineering and easement work to increase the cul-de-sac diameter to about 90 feet. The letter was acknowledged and signed in 1996 by subdivision representatives.

Planning staff said the road currently is shown as a 15-foot easement on the plat and that the subdivision has not replatting the road to 60 feet county-wide as the letter referenced. Staff said the county has not formally accepted the road through a recorded board action and that recent changes to signage and county maintenance (the county changed a green county-road sign to a blue private-road sign and stopped plowing) had prompted complaints from residents.

Commissioners and staff discussed the legal and practical steps required to accept the road—staff said a road validation and survey would be needed to confirm a 60-foot width across affected properties and that replatting or signed easements by property owners would likely be required. Staff emphasized that \"one commissioner cannot\" accept and adopt a county road without board action and that private-road maintenance agreements and addressing requirements affect emergency access and saleability of lots.

Planning staff also described a separate, recurring problem in other subdivisions where private roads were created and private-road maintenance agreements were not drafted while a single owner still held all lots; later, when ownership is split, neighbors sometimes cannot agree on a maintenance plan and roads become a point of contention.

Staff said the county will contact affected property owners about private-road maintenance agreements in particular cases and suggested reviewing addressing and building-permit processes to require maintenance agreements earlier when a private road is anticipated.

No final board action was taken at the meeting to accept Cottonwood Hollow roads; staff said they would follow up with property owners and outline the requirements for road validation, replatting and easement documentation.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","Sep 8, 2025 — Posted Sep 5, 2025 10:50 AM","oneSentenceSummary","Planning staff and commissioners reviewed a 1996 letter about Cottonwood Hollow road acceptance, noted the easement width discrepancies and discussed the county's private-road maintenance and addressing requirements and how those affect future development.","taxTitle","Jefferson County, Idaho","taxId",52189,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":50,"_51":81,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":82,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":83,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6006709,"Commissioners approve amended plat splitting Radford Acres parcel into two lots",191,2147000,2338000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825043-16560ccce4abc13f647c226911d956d2&start=2147&end=2338","/articles/6006709/Jefferson-County/Idaho/Commissioners-approve-amended-plat-splitting-Radford-Acres-parcel-into-two-lots","The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners approved a first-amendment amended plat for Radford Acres on Sept. 8, 2025, to split an existing roughly 20-acre parcel into two lots (referred to in staff materials as Lots 6A and 6B).

Planning staff described the change as an administrative amendment that divides the single lot and noted the property lies in the R-5 zone just off County Line Road. Staff said each new lot shows 20 water shares; the planning presentation did not list the canal name on the submitted materials. \"They are within code to do that,\" a planning staff member said when asked whether the split complied with subdivision rules.

Commissioners discussed access and asked whether both lots would use separate entrances off County Line Road or a shared entrance. Staff said the plat did not show final entrance locations and suggested using a single entrance that branches to both lots would be preferable for safety and road management. The planning presentation later identified the Enterprise Canal company as the canal associated with water shares.

A motion to approve the first-amendment amended plat for Radford Acres was moved, seconded and approved by roll call. The transcript records the motion as approval of the amended plat converting one lot into two; no conditions or overrides were noted in the public discussion.

Planning staff also raised other subdivision and private-road issues during the meeting, including how private-road maintenance agreements and addressing rules can affect later lot construction and access requirements.

The approval was handled during the planning and zoning portion of the meeting and will be reflected in the county’s subdivision records.","The Jefferson County Board approved a first-amendment amended plat for Radford Acres that divides an existing roughly 20-acre parcel into two lots in an R-5 zone and notes water shares and access concerns.",{"_33":85,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":86,"_41":87,"_43":88,"_45":89,"_47":90,"_49":50,"_51":91,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":92,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":93,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6006714,"Jefferson County approves $6,808 welder purchase for jail and facilities work",756,1349000,2105000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825043-16560ccce4abc13f647c226911d956d2&start=1349&end=2105","/articles/6006714/Jefferson-County/Idaho/Jefferson-County-approves-6808-welder-purchase-for-jail-and-facilities-work","The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners voted to approve the purchase of a Millermatic/Multimatic 220 welder for $6,808.59 for use by county maintenance and jail staff.

County maintenance staff and commissioners discussed the specifications, portability and uses of the machine before the vote. Maintenance staff said the multifunction machine can run AC/DC, TIG and MIG and is compact enough to be used inside the jail where larger welders cannot be powered. \"I'm a very experienced guy,\" the maintenance worker said when asked whether he could operate the machine.

The machine was described as capable of welding stainless steel, aluminum and other metals that the county needs repaired, including kitchen equipment and interior speaker boxes in pods that cannot accept large power draws. Staff said the county had three vendor quotes within about $45 of each other and identified Norco as the selected vendor.

On funding, the maintenance presenter said he would shift money from other line items, naming carpet-cleaning and tool budgets as possible sources. He said there remained unspent funds in his budget that could cover the purchase. Commissioners did not require additional budget action at the meeting and approved the purchase by motion and roll call.

No amendments or contingencies to the purchase were recorded in the meeting minutes. The county intends to issue a purchase order and proceed with acquiring the welder from Norco.

The meeting transcript shows the item was discussed during the open session following a morning recess and that commissioners acknowledged the procurement details and funding source options prior to voting.","The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners approved purchase of a Millermatic/Multimatic 220 welder for use by county maintenance and jail staff, after staff explained the machine's multifunction capabilities and budget adjustments.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners debate Cottonwood Hollow road status, private-road agreements and addressing rules

Commissioners approve amended plat splitting Radford Acres parcel into two lots

Jefferson County approves $6,808 welder purchase for jail and facilities work