In a recent meeting of the Nashua Zoning Board, residents voiced strong concerns regarding a proposed variance application by local homeowner Mr. Chatfield. The application seeks to allow a kitchen and bathroom addition that would extend three feet into the required 30-foot setback from the property line, raising significant privacy and property value issues among neighbors.
During the public hearing, a neighbor expressed her objections, citing the topography of the land, which places Mr. Chatfield's property at a higher elevation than hers. She argued that the proposed addition would encroach on her privacy and light, as it would bring the structure closer to her yard, significantly impacting her enjoyment of her property. She emphasized that the existing layout already allows for a direct line of sight into her home, and any further encroachment would exacerbate this issue.
Another resident, Mr. Shannon, echoed these concerns, highlighting that the application lacked a clear demonstration of hardship, a requirement for granting a variance. He pointed out that the application was incomplete, missing critical information that would justify the request. Additionally, he raised concerns about a shed on Mr. Chatfield's property that allegedly violates setback rules, questioning the applicant's adherence to zoning regulations.
The board members deliberated on the application, with several expressing skepticism about the necessity of the variance. They noted that the applicant could potentially redesign the addition to comply with existing setback requirements without compromising his plans significantly. The consensus among board members leaned towards denying the application, as they found no compelling evidence of hardship that would warrant an exception to the zoning rules.
As the meeting concluded, the board's decision will play a crucial role in determining how neighborhood dynamics evolve in this area of Nashua. Residents remain hopeful that their concerns will be taken into account, ensuring that community standards and privacy are upheld. The board's final ruling on Mr. Chatfield's application is anticipated in the coming weeks, as they continue to weigh the implications of this proposed addition on the local community.