[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6470063,"mediaKeyId","5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688","parentId",5780125,"title","Council moves multiple rezoning items, defers others and debates rezoning of city-owned property","audioSeconds",76,"startMs",821230,"endMs",897250,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688&start=821&end=897","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688/thumbnail_821230.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6470063/Charlotte/Mecklenburg-County/North-Carolina/Council-moves-multiple-rezoning-items-defers-others-and-debates-rezoning-of-city-owned-property","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6470063-18acf3d50383990cf72e627d234e73b0/orig.mp4?Expires=1771156305&Signature=IxvzH0UvMkcVd6hDX1KGUbnrHrMbnzcCkgpnTkNtUqot1xa89HzZEb8h9rSsbavAgIPCfFW9Jk6FX-v~OC2Vn4X-W8Cs2v-oxDa3u5Kp6CF3e~XkOklTpUWMG4Azf6jHdDGyre7onz3ih-vvTWNQJbG39R-DeXzQ3M-afxrzf4B2EsEj4WEOWh~-vpx8xNZlVt6~gEo0kOXYmwnYW2HlPvxhyulPI0MYrj0HdJpWu2XMd1zRgcLdOVsteEzGl82SRZAqKbMfVM9hnU17GQrFCJ2HWMXomQ4HK0swUVjKRMaAKpOsmlssKfSFolDlIL5mIHhy0TiznvLgkTaRiiWzlw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Charlotte","date","2025-09-15T23:57:35.567Z","article","Charlotte City Council handled a broad consent agenda and several procedural motions during its Sept. 15 zoning meeting, approving multiple routine rezonings, deferring a small number of items and debating the city's role as petitioner for city-owned property.

Early in the meeting staff requested a deferral of one decision (item 16) and three hearings (items 20, 21 and 27) to Oct. 20, 2025; the council approved the deferral unanimously. Later in the agenda the council considered the consent motion to approve petitions listed as items 3 through 15. Several items were pulled for discussion, one item (13) was later deferred at the request of neighborhood representatives to allow more community engagement, and multiple consent items were approved by voice vote. Councilmember LaJuana Mayfield recorded opposition on several individual items during those votes.

A separate exchange occurred when council members questioned why the city itself was listed as the petitioner on a rezoning for a city-owned parcel. Councilmembers asked why the city would rezone property before a private developer had expressed interest; planning staff and the assistant city attorney explained that it is standard practice for the city to petition when it owns property and that rezoning can make the property 'biddable' for future development or be used to achieve public objectives such as parking for an entertainment complex.

Other procedural outcomes included the zoning committee announcing its meeting schedule and the council's adoption of multiple zoning committee statements of consistency for the consent items, in some cases with recorded opposition from Councilmember Mayfield. The council also approved site-plan and site-design changes on several petitions after staff reported that petitioners had resolved minor outstanding items in advance of the vote.

The council closed the meeting after final votes and a substituted motion to defer one pulled consent item to allow additional neighborhood engagement; staff will continue routine follow-up on adopted petitions and deferred items.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council Zoning Meeting - September 15, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","On Sept. 15 the council approved a package of consent rezoning items, deferred one decision and three hearings to Oct. 20, and debated why the city petitions rezoning of city-owned property that may be developed later.","taxTitle","Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina","taxId",4848,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6470068,"Staff opposes WT Harris gas-station rezoning; neighbors and District 5 councilmember raise consistency and notice concerns",979,2474505,3454220,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688&start=2474&end=3454","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688/thumbnail_2474505.jpg","/articles/6470068/Charlotte/Mecklenburg-County/North-Carolina/Staff-opposes-WT-Harris-gas-station-rezoning-neighbors-and-District-5-councilmember-raise-consistency-and-notice-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6470068-d949bf98076e1b550caaa5c6db2ef2ba/orig.mp4?Expires=1771156305&Signature=RacYOOs3jU9VVptNJBx1pahd3jotbsEmmrnnIKwfL7CTDuOfjgFtEuQaCuHw2dZG0GmlUPSKIer3Px8UoPG04gosFop4q9JCNr2EH3c6xOMSGCV8x7ekw8pKnLWh5FgHrjZXGJZAC8nXPvUwRFU-deCEdPNiEix-hOAvz3~6MDjv~nXcH45jPNIItW5MLuwpbWqmLcW6GLWUt~AnEVA6RBbCcYIwH3aXkDCrbiGT5yGTrHrVQKF0IAk3IrZQ7HTncuG4BevTAagxk5Qre5pn7u0fjznskl5ihpKCiFobSJ13GgYEkVx8am7I8wyWoHCQFjTJNe7PXQzc01fnSVQivA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City planning staff recommended against a rezoning request for a proposed vehicle fueling facility on East W.T. Harris Boulevard (agenda item 20) during the Sept. 15 zoning meeting, citing site constraints and unresolved design and access issues.

Harold Johnson, the staff presenter, told council the 1.24-acre site faces utility easement limitations and layout challenges that make it difficult to meet the design standards intended for neighborhood centers. The petitioner, represented at the podium by Jordan, said the project would have four pump islands, a small retail area and a commercial kitchen and that the design includes a 12-foot multi-use path and dedication of right-of-way along both frontages.

District 5 Councilmember Marjorie Molina said she did not receive notice of the project and told council the parcel sits 0.4 miles from a nearly 28-acre public park Mecklenburg County is investing in. Molina said the area is \"highly residential\" and that adding another fuel-and-convenience operation next to a new park is inconsistent with the 2040 plan's Neighborhood 1 place type. She said the public meeting for the petition drew just three attendees from the neighborhood, which she described as insufficient for the scope of a land-use exception.

Jordan said neighbors asked for a wood fence and that the petitioner intends to operate a cleaning crew and security cameras. Staff and council asked for additional revisions to address transportation, site and building design issues; staff noted the petitioner missed the formal deadline to submit revised materials but that a revised plan could still be submitted for review ahead of zoning committee.

Councilmember Matt Driggs (listed in the transcript as Mr. Driggs) cautioned the petitioner that approval without staff support would be unlikely, calling the path \"bumpy\" and encouraging the petitioner to gauge community and staff support before incurring further expense.

A motion to close the public hearing was approved unanimously; no final rezoning decision was taken at the Sept. 15 meeting. Staff said it will continue to work with the petitioner, CDOT and community stakeholders to address the outstanding issues before the petition returns to committee.","A proposed gas station on East W.T. Harris Boulevard drew staff opposition and sustained criticism from District 5 Councilmember Marjorie Molina, who said notification was inadequate and that the site conflicts with the 2040 plan's Neighborhood 1 place type.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6470073,"Council approves rezoning for proposed for-sale townhome community over objections about traffic and infrastructure",236,1101765,1338760,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688&start=1101&end=1338","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5780125-0a86a60b6038fb2121fcb167dd4b5688/thumbnail_1101765.jpg","/articles/6470073/Charlotte/Mecklenburg-County/North-Carolina/Council-approves-rezoning-for-proposed-for-sale-townhome-community-over-objections-about-traffic-and-infrastructure","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6470073-365004e7c9941eda54616b3d0ced4516/orig.mp4?Expires=1771156305&Signature=HQ6qQCCqA5RcbZnwK~itYWQCwEVKNgh1sy6swZCvZ6XplGZN-S5RdH~eUTFMCnXC13KzeGyfyPmvrPzaP7xRVEjluU-gFdWtN0oNKfIUV1uGJOLDpHTCD4i1pYS2Rbqfg~Oxu6xPLs1lKgZs0SDnwxkSUGL76Ok1NvyP5z-BUDPhKy6SSq4~-3v2Zl2~FoUykNf-x0yaw~iyiF288yKYS3Sjc4fvDIpB9bDUVCaQwTJmcZRyiIj3Pefeop2FTNdxE9kGz8E27oZTHGbugSZRZd1W~WiW5iXkrEyLNeAwoj~LNPqT5UufH9z0fl6leWp8DjlUMtIhiq0vu3RU8mo-cQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Charlotte City Council approved a rezoning on Sept. 15 that would allow a developer to build up to 575 attached, for-sale dwellings on a site the council considered under item 3.

The council approved the zoning committee's statement of consistency for the petition after a period of discussion; Councilmember LaJuana Mayfield cast the sole recorded opposing vote, citing concerns about traffic and infrastructure capacity.

Councilmember LaJuana Mayfield said the scale of the proposal was ‘‘very highly intensive’’ and raised the project's projected trip generation, saying the proposal could create about 4,331 potential daily trips compared with an entitlement under current zoning of 1,988 trips. Mayfield said the cumulative transportation impacts and limited available funding for road improvements meant she would vote no.

Councilmember Johnson (identified in the record as \"Miss Johnson\") responded that the petition was for-sale housing rather than rental apartments and that the petitioner had submitted a traffic study and planned infrastructure improvements. Johnson also said the developer would donate about 5.3 acres to Mecklenburg County for a future public park and that local partners including the University City partners and a District 4 coalition supported the project. She said those points informed her decision to support approval.

Staff did not list any unresolved legal authorities during the discussion. No formal conditions beyond the zoning committee statement of consistency were read into the public record during the decision vote.

The council took the vote by raising hands. The motion to approve the zoning committee statement of consistency carried with Mayfield recorded as opposed.

The matter will proceed through the normal follow-up steps for a zoning approval, including any required site-plan reviews and any subsequent permits needed before construction begins.","Charlotte City Council on Sept. 15 approved a rezoning that clears the way for up to 575 attached for-sale dwellings after council members debated traffic impacts, infrastructure funding and a visitor-service land donation to Mecklenburg County.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council moves multiple rezoning items, defers others and debates rezoning of city-owned property

Staff opposes WT Harris gas-station rezoning; neighbors and District 5 councilmember raise consistency and notice concerns

Council approves rezoning for proposed for-sale townhome community over objections about traffic and infrastructure