The public hearing on the Oxford House zoning request took place on July 22, 2025, in Excelsior Springs, Missouri, drawing significant community concern and discussion. The session focused on the proposal to change zoning regulations to allow a recovery house to operate in a residential area, which has sparked a heated debate among local residents.

The meeting began with residents voicing their opinions on the proposed zoning change. Jacob Stallman, a nearby resident, expressed his concerns regarding the transparency and honesty of the Oxford House organization. He highlighted that he was unaware of the house's intended use until recently and questioned the safety and legality of the modifications made to the property. Stallman emphasized that while he supports individuals seeking recovery, he fears that approving this request could lead to a proliferation of similar facilities in the neighborhood, potentially compromising safety for families with children.

Bill Westerhadi, another resident, echoed Stallman's sentiments, citing a lack of transparency from the Oxford House management. He recounted a personal experience where he was misinformed about the house's purpose during a conversation with the owners. Westerhadi raised concerns about the facility's location, noting accessibility issues and the potential hazards for residents without vehicles. He urged the city council to consider existing zoning districts that could accommodate such facilities without altering residential areas.

Bridal Johnson, a long-time resident and property owner adjacent to the proposed recovery house, also voiced his opposition. He questioned the legality of the renovations made to the house, suggesting that they did not comply with building codes. Johnson expressed frustration over the potential tax implications of a nonprofit operating in a residential district and questioned whether such a facility would be welcomed in other neighborhoods.

The public hearing concluded with a brief recess, allowing council members to reflect on the community's concerns. The discussions highlighted a strong sentiment among residents against the zoning change, primarily due to issues of safety, transparency, and the potential impact on the neighborhood's character. The city council is expected to deliberate on the matter further, weighing the community's feedback against the proposed benefits of the recovery house.