[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6025512,"mediaKeyId","5754994-81dff1e870eea073c1ade8d8ba69818a","parentId",5754994,"title","Planning panel delays Allendale rezoning and homeless‑youth shelter decision after neighborhood concerns","audioSeconds",6747,"startMs",651000,"endMs",7398000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5754994-81dff1e870eea073c1ade8d8ba69818a&start=651&end=7398","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5754994-81dff1e870eea073c1ade8d8ba69818a/thumbnail_651000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6025512/Waukegan/DuPage-County/Illinois/Planning-panel-delays-Allendale-rezoning-and-homelessyouth-shelter-decision-after-neighborhood-concerns","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6025512-3411be372af430f7b61ab5588fb5aa20/orig.mp4?Expires=1770967971&Signature=ZhQ3kAKk4qKD-eEBbCtljw7p49wPyUeeEk7MfYCRdGJNlKDwNACxEcG~b~N~jl4ccVv~wgDWDCxJtwyNLJPVNLCMc6-ZjwFxoru23NAp5pjTFvnosMY1mHnrYMZE7xxzbemUtUZVUGOyIy1alPmUvrOAqSRJiH0zao5uFeNiwydFa9-lWxfZuFzxdIG2ydI7FsLUZ8v2rDcSAYCWvf8NUGMoGYYiW3343wvvP74i0qksjneYYSX1gXdxIc5jbZFWBVFSkWndA3K2r4rfcLTq2uTPwSO9UQGX6uuhEzvPCzdLWSjN7S58QJABHsEyrGin~Hhc6r22lNk5Icj-lgxhHA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Waukegan, IL","date","2025-08-15T00:00:00Z","article","The Waukegan Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 14 voted to continue two related items — a map amendment and a conditional‑use permit for a proposed youth emergency shelter at 421 West Water Street — to the commission's next meeting on Sept. 11 so staff can convene Allendale Association, police and neighborhood representatives to discuss conditions and operational details.

The proposal from Allendale, a longtime youth services provider, would rezone the property from the B‑4 Downtown District to the HC (Health Civic) District and authorize a nine‑bed emergency shelter serving runaway or unhoused boys ages 14–17. Under the proposal, six beds would be used for short respite stays (about 21 business days, roughly 30 days) and three beds could be used for extended stays up to 120 days. Allendale told commissioners the facility would have two trained youth‑care workers on daytime shifts and one overnight staffer, with additional on‑call staff and 24/7 access to a program manager.

Why it matters: commissioners said the program addresses a documented shortage of emergency shelter beds for youth in Lake County while several neighbors told the commission they had experienced ongoing quality‑of‑life and safety concerns during decades when Allendale operated at the site. Commissioners directed staff to meet with Allendale, Waukegan and Lake Villa police, and representatives of the neighborhood — including the Ramirez family who live adjacent to the site — to identify neighborhood protections that might make a referral to city development staff and ultimately to city council more acceptable.

Staff presentation and applicant description
Planning staff described the change as required because the proposed use is classified in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) as a homeless shelter in the HC zoning district; the prior use on the site had been licensed previously as a group community residence and ceased operations in 2024. Rachel (planning staff) told commissioners the shelter classification is triggered by the temporary nature of stays and the program model (referring out for therapeutic services rather than providing on‑site clinical services).

Allendale representatives said the proposal is for the agency's STAR (Shelter and Transitional Adolescent Resource) program. Laura Kramer, senior director of program development at Allendale, said the agency has operated in Lake County since 1897 and at the Water Street site since 1987. Maribel Viness, STAR program manager, described intake pathways (primarily referrals from the Department of Human Services through community case management partners) and said Allendale operates both short respite and longer transitional living beds.

Operational details provided at the hearing
- Capacity and ages: up to nine residents, ages 14–17.
- Length of stay: six beds intended for short respite stays (about 21 business days / ~30 days); three beds available for extended stays up to 120 days.
- Staffing: two trained youth‑care workers in daytime shifts and one trained overnight staff person; on‑call backup and 24/7 access to a program manager.
- Curfew: applicants said house rules include a 10 p.m. curfew on nights other than weekends (11 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays).
- Services: structured supervision, case management, connection to school or virtual schooling, life‑skills groups and referrals to community mental‑health resources.

Neighborhood concerns and public testimony
More than a dozen residents and property owners testified, many from the block immediately adjacent to the Allendale property. Recurring concerns included: lack of advance notice to some neighbors (staff said certified notices go to property owners within 250 feet per state law, and a sign was posted on the property); reports of repeated police responses to the Allendale Lake Villa campus; trash and property‑maintenance problems; alleged past incidents at the Water Street site, including a 2017 fire affecting a building on the Allendale property; and worries about young male residents' daytime activity and impacts on neighbors' ability to use their yards.

Opponents included multiple adjacent residents who live at 415 West Water Street and other nearby addresses; supporters included letters read into the record from the state representative for the 60th District, the Lake County Coalition for Homelessness, Lake County SASS (Screening, Assessment and Support Services) and Staben House. Supporters emphasized the shortage of youth‑specific emergency shelter beds in Lake County and cited the agency's licensure, accreditations and program outcomes.

Applicant responses and data cited
Allendale representatives responded to neighborhood testimony by describing training and supervision policies, partnerships with law enforcement, and program outcomes. Chief clinical officer Dr. Eric Alexiev described training under an ARC (Attachment, Regulation, Competency) framework, in‑person training modules and practice‑based coaching. Allendale staff said they reviewed incident data for the Water Street program and said that between 2013 and 2019 they counted 69 police contacts at the Allendale address; excluding mandatory runaway reports filed by the agency for missing youths reduced that figure to 29 calls over the six‑year span.

Allendale also provided program data for its STAR population (2022–2025): the agency said it had served 44 youth in the 14–24 range, nine of whom were ages 14–17 in the emergency shelter cohort; they reported 15 youth currently on a wait list for services. For the 14–17 shelter population, Allendale said six of nine residents had a return‑home goal and that five of those six achieved the return home outcome (an 83% return‑home rate for that subgroup); the agency said 92% of program participants were employed or enrolled in school at exit across programs (applicant‑supplied figures).

Commissioners' concerns and next steps
Commissioners raised neighborhood protection measures that could be added as conditions — examples offered by staff included increased site lighting, security cameras, visible staff identification, regularly scheduled neighborhood‑police coordination meetings and enhanced property maintenance. Commissioners noted the site's shared driveway and asked staff to study whether a privacy fence, alternative driveway alignment or other physical measures were feasible without creating new safety or access problems.

Formal action and vote
The commission considered two related docket items (zoning calendar 2789, the map amendment from B‑4 to HC, and zoning calendar 2790, the conditional‑use permit for the homeless shelter). Commissioners voted on a continuance to allow staff to coordinate additional meetings and potential conditions. Final roll call on the continuance (both items) recorded: Haug (abstain), Haines (yes), Young (yes), Carlos (yes), Ewing (yes), Shepard (yes), Anderson (yes), Bill (no). Outcome: continued to Sept. 11, 2025. (The Sept. 11 meeting was set for 7 p.m.)

Votes at a glance
- Motion to continue zoning calendar 2789 (map amendment B‑4 to HC at 421 West Water Street): motion made on the record; outcome — continued to Sept. 11, 2025 (roll call above).
- Motion to continue zoning calendar 2790 (conditional use permit for a homeless shelter at 421 West Water Street): motion made and seconded; outcome — continued to Sept. 11, 2025 (same roll call).

What remains open
Staff was directed to convene a meeting that includes Allendale, representatives of the Ramirez family and other neighborhood representatives, and Waukegan and Lake Villa police to identify specific, feasible conditions (for example: visible staff IDs, camera and lighting upgrades, regular meetings with police, and a property‑maintenance plan) that could be recommended to city development staff and city council if the commission later forwards an approval recommendation.

Ending
The commission scheduled both items for the Sept. 11 Planning and Zoning meeting and requested that staff return with the results of the coordination meetings and proposed draft conditions for any eventual recommendation.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","2025-08-14 City of Waukegan Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","The Waukegan Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 14 voted to continue two related items — a map amendment and a conditional‑use permit for a proposed youth emergency shelter at 421 West Water Street — to the Sept. 11 meeting so staff can convene Allendale, police and neighborhood representatives to discuss conditions.","taxTitle","Waukegan, DuPage County, Illinois","taxId",2647,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6025508,"Planning commission approves first substantive Unified Development Ordinance edits since adoption",1387,7477000,8864000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5754994-81dff1e870eea073c1ade8d8ba69818a&start=7477&end=8864","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5754994-81dff1e870eea073c1ade8d8ba69818a/thumbnail_7477000.jpg","/articles/6025508/Waukegan/DuPage-County/Illinois/Planning-commission-approves-first-substantive-Unified-Development-Ordinance-edits-since-adoption","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6025508-f41cb80c447465b3b63ad10e6cea1c3a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770967971&Signature=YYXgY5CYGAdD9DVQintRCXIVuGGrBFfm~ICys3EpO9iuCenNjKZCzjnLECChZHpr2nNV3iCn-2HyBXRRwv63vbVo0F-i22BMQlxHDhcoShtXm05z5DqO-TtEycmz3-L5VxsaGokI1bX3uXuLNJF5n7OxWHpl5nlM2nLT8wvt6Cdj7Oe9OdOyGPEqgK0x66ArmEn-a1euqbq4c5HSwDY57C8N1KnIa4ySpJU6oY7DcVARk6ax66mcOordrySWdHpOueOHZiCGIRdrN9x0oqF5aIFOxs7k8alwhH4ADHo~LVmQjrKtlhcgDDWvHnbB5-WE~GbG8FIeNPJkvIZqRHTSbA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Waukegan Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 14 voted to recommend a package of substantive amendments to the city's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), a set of changes staff said are intended to fix practical issues that emerged after a year of implementation.

The amendments cover multiple topics: clearer use definitions and a few new use categories (including a ‘‘fleet management facility’’), relocation of minimum lot‑size language into the use table, procedural adjustments for variances and appeals, an exemption for existing parking lots from some new landscaping requirements, a new formal process to revoke conditional‑use permits, naming clarifications for residential district labels (R‑1/R‑2 as limited residential), and several definition and process clarifications. Staff also added an exemption to allow community solar projects under state programs to function without requiring on‑site use of the generated power.

Why it matters: the UDO consolidated the city’s zoning, sign, subdivision, tree/landscape and design guidelines into a single code. After a year of real‑world use, planning staff said the changes will reduce unnecessary permitting burdens, fix regulatory inconsistencies and add transparency to enforcement options while retaining community protections.

Staff presentation and key changes
Planner Sam Green told commissioners that the ordinance has made permitting simpler in practice but surfaced multiple places where language or process needed revision. Highlights Green described at the meeting included:
- Use table and definitions: new use categories (example: fleet management facility) and relocation of minimum lot‑size rules into the use table to make them easier to find.
- Variance and review process: shifted small accessory‑structure variances and other minor adjustments to the Development Review Board while routing sign variances directly to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
- Existing parking lots: existing, legally permitted parking lots are exempted from some new parking‑lot landscaping requirements to reduce retrofit costs when a parking area is replaced in its same footprint; new or expanded lots remain subject to landscaping standards.
- Revocation process: added a spelled‑out process under Section 4.12 to allow the commission to consider revoking a conditional‑use permit for chronic noncompliance; staff said the intent is to provide a clear, transparent path that would be used only after repeated noncompliance.
- Residential district clarifications: renaming R‑1 and R‑2 as limited residential and R‑3/R‑4 as general residential to reduce confusion about allowed housing types.
- Solar and energy: clarified solar panel coverage rules and added an explicit exemption for community solar projects governed by state programs.

Commission discussion and small edits
Commissioners asked for several clarifications and identified a few additional edits. One commissioner noted the park district’s indoor recreational facilities should be explicitly allowed in CR zoned properties; staff and a commissioner flagged that as an oversight to review. Commissioners also asked staff to distinguish between ‘‘solar arrays’’ and ‘‘solar roofs’’ (integrated roofing products) and staff committed to review the language to avoid unintended limits on emerging technologies.

A staff wording tweak requested at the meeting clarified entrance orientation language for multi‑unit residential buildings (to make clear that a side entrance must be accessed from the front lot/sidewalk). The commission’s motion to recommend the amendments included that edit.

Formal action and vote
A motion to recommend approval of the proposed UDO amendments, with the agreed edit clarifying entrance orientation for multi‑unit buildings, passed by roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously.

What happens next
With the Planning and Zoning Commission action, staff will forward the recommended UDO amendments through the city's formal adoption path (development review staff and city council steps as required by local procedure). Staff said the UDO will remain a living document and invited the commission and stakeholders to propose future targeted edits.

Ending
Commissioners asked staff to circulate a printed copy of the revised UDO and to monitor items raised during the hearing (park‑district indoor recreation in CR, solar language, and the ‘‘good standing’’ acceptance language) for final technical edits before council consideration.","The commission voted Aug. 14 to recommend several substantive amendments to the city's Unified Development Ordinance, adopting clarifications to uses, permitting processes, parking and landscape rules, and a new revocation process; the motion carried unanimously with a minor wording amendment to clarify multi‑unit building entrance orientation.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning panel delays Allendale rezoning and homeless‑youth shelter decision after neighborhood concerns

Planning commission approves first substantive Unified Development Ordinance edits since adoption