[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6474229,"mediaKeyId","5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62","parentId",5742414,"title","SFPUC adopts revised cross‑connection control plan; hazard assessments to cover all services over 25 years","audioSeconds",1743,"startMs",4603000,"endMs",6346000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62&start=4603&end=6346","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62/thumbnail_4603000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6474229/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/SFPUC-adopts-revised-crossconnection-control-plan-hazard-assessments-to-cover-all-services-over-25-years","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6474229-de16d861e53fcaa1090e794c08ce9719/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181342&Signature=PDcXKAyZ69xLXkyHatToL7u3VJ6b460Hk~NE9Oaqq04cRHVLYJOIryl2937U-KANZ1IBuIfG7qh~Dnksjk2a-ZagSEwiixgfTR4T3vxPhvT2Jl1b7UBea5wwBKDSDbr~Fn-XXXzTQtu-fWSnM2T6kgtL0v06c2q~no6fg8ajy8k2lSyJ-kKuBW~1WC2lP7JCSxc32Z4dlyAlX790DeK~hLTfQSnbwnFmkfNyzCWF5VWlXJ1DIRklkJlVORk5lq1IsXcyfyOaUKGZ9cwlMEJGOj8WlXy7jbIyJqLHtYD5~EbvH6f4YTp-aJm2iUHRJkxXHTF6wck-0nl7CLiyntV7qg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of San Francisco","date","2025-09-09T00:00:00Z","article","The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission on Thursday approved a revised Cross Connection Control Plan and manual to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board’s cross‑connection control policy handbook. The plan, presented by Water Quality Division Director Andrew Grasso, sets a schedule and work plan to identify and mitigate cross‑connection risks across the city’s water system.

Why it matters: cross connections are physical links that could allow non‑potable water to enter the potable distribution system. State policy now requires utilities to perform hazard assessments for service connections beyond the historical subset of commercial and high‑risk accounts; SFPUC must identify hazards for all 182,000 services in its system and bring the program into compliance.

Key provisions and timeline

- Scope expansion and schedule: SFPUC currently manages roughly 35,000 backflow prevention assemblies covering about 18,000 services. The new plan requires hazard assessments for all 182,000 services; staff negotiated with the State Water Board to perform assessments over a 25‑year timeframe.

- Fire services upgrades: Approximately 4,200 fire service connections currently use single swing checks that do not meet the new policy’s required backflow prevention standards (RP assemblies). SFPUC said it will replace these swing checks and work with customers, the Fire Department and the Department of Building Inspection (DBI) to coordinate upgrades and permitting. Staff estimated individual customer installation costs for required devices may range from $10,000 to $100,000 depending on site complexity.

- Hydrant and temporary connections: Roughly 300 hydrant connections used for temporary services will need RP devices; SFPUC expects to procure and phase deployment of these devices.

- Pilot and staffing: SFPUC intends to run a pilot program (proposed ~100 fire service replacements and ~1,000 hazard assessments) to estimate costs, staffing and permitting needs before full roll‑out. New staffing and contractor resources will be required; enforcement procedures for noncooperative property owners will be developed.

- Implementation and cost concerns: Staff said the largest near‑term costs will be program startup (staffing, outreach, device procurement) and capital work to replace swing checks. The plan assumes long‑term replacement over a 20‑year to 25‑year period; staff said they negotiated a 20‑year timeline for some fire service changes with the state but retained a 25‑year horizon for hazard assessments in the revised manual.

Commission questions and public input

Commissioners pressed staff on residential impacts (the policy requires assessments for single‑family homes as well as commercial buildings) and on how SFPUC will detect and prioritize actual backflow events. Staff said reverse‑flow events are rare but detectable with current advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) in some large anomalies; AMI noise and battery life limit continuous, minute‑level detection.

Staff emphasized outreach and coordination with the Fire Department, DBI and communications staff and said the agency will prioritize upgrades that align with customer remodeling projects and contractors’ schedules to reduce duplicative work.

Vote and next steps

Commissioners approved the plan. President Stacy, Commissioner Jamdar, Commissioner Levarone and Commissioner Thurlow voted aye; Vice President Arce was absent. Staff will submit the plan to the State Water Resources Control Board and return with detailed pilot results, cost estimates and a proposed enforcement approach.

Speakers recorded in the presentation included Andrew Grasso (Water Quality Division Director) and Steve Ritchie (Assistant General Manager for Water), with follow‑up comments and questions by commissioners.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of San Francisco - Video Open Video Only in Windows Media Player","oneSentenceSummary","The SFPUC approved a revised cross‑connection control plan that expands hazard assessments to all 182,000 service connections on a 25‑year schedule and requires upgrades to many fire and temporary service connections.","taxTitle","San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California","taxId",5751,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6474234,"SFPUC approves 2025 Public Health Goal report; staff flags bromate, hexavalent chromium and lead concerns",1929,2669000,4598000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62&start=2669&end=4598","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62/thumbnail_2669000.jpg","/articles/6474234/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/SFPUC-approves-2025-Public-Health-Goal-report-staff-flags-bromate-hexavalent-chromium-and-lead-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6474234-d7f3f735c50bcc6dd4ab4a2b73d3adfd/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181342&Signature=XknTMslL0081e-A5tK0YMmNqfSSKwQXtv8wmbndFLT65ud-z3WVujA4piO7pB5i5vbjHBDy599fkMC-d-IvVi3e7EL8K0e4yDBJ~WFqQ4smQguQ-H75RvbvQHK0yPhcE0826HO6BSNGJwdgJc9bz4MGp6-DRSSFKB0jet6QoYfKdZmMFlDaABK9Fpiv4gZ6bf22jzHJ6u0GmuQ4jSMER1Onww4PfVu1h7txvCrhc8AeD0SMX87t-6CGht6i4iPkUdBjH7ll7FkvNzJlXfre9rBOgjwD8-QVI~sRzMEVPHnKLxs0g~8-2s4xJcXcJ-hQbeEGm6~LuXmLsxN0frj2XLA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission on Thursday voted to approve the San Francisco Water System 2025 Public Health Goal (PHG) report and directed the general manager or the general manager’s designee to submit a letter to the State Water Resources Control Board documenting that a public hearing was held.

The report compares recent monitoring data to California public-health goals or federal maximum contaminant level goals where state goals do not exist and identifies three contaminants that exceed public-health goals: bromate, hexavalent chromium and lead. Commissioners approved the report by voice vote; President Stacy, Commissioner Jamdar, Commissioner Levarone and Commissioner Thurlow voted aye; Vice President Arce was recorded absent.

Why it matters: public-health goals are non‑enforceable benchmarks intended to identify potential health risks and treatment options. Commission staff said the three contaminants of concern appear at concentrations far below regulatory limits (maximum contaminant levels) but above the PHGs, which are typically much lower.

Key findings and staff response

- Bromate: Detected at the Harry Tracy Water Treatment Plant where ozone is used. Staff said bromide in source water reacts with ozone to form bromate, a probable human carcinogen. The report recommends ongoing watershed protection, monthly monitoring of bromide, and optimization of ozone dosing to minimize bromate formation.

- Hexavalent chromium: Detected at low levels that exceed the PHG. Staff said likely sources include groundwater, soils and treatment‑chemical impurities. The State Water Resources Control Board has identified best available treatment (BAT) only for the MCL, not for the much lower PHG. SFPUC said it blends groundwater with high‑quality surface water to reduce levels and maintains a chemical quality control program to limit contaminants introduced by treatment chemicals.

- Lead: The PHG for lead is 0.2 ppb. Staff noted that most lead detected in customers’ tap samples originates from plumbing and fixtures on the customer side rather than SFPUC distribution mains. SFPUC reported it previously removed roughly 7,000 known lead service lines in the 1980s and 1990s and has been replacing galvanized “required replacement” service lines identified in subsequent surveys.

Lead program numbers provided by staff

- SFPUC said it identified about 1,578 galvanized service lines in earlier surveys that required replacement and launched a 10‑year replacement program starting June 2020.

- As of the June reporting cutoff, SFPUC reported replacing approximately 90% of the meters that needed lead‑free versions and expects to complete the utility‑side lead user service line replacements by mid‑2026. Staff said they now estimate roughly 700 galvanized required‑replacement lines will remain after additional survey work.

- The utility said unknown service lines (initially 407) are being resolved through further investigation; any unresolved unknown is treated as a required replacement under the lead and copper rule.

Staff noted that installing full‑scale treatment to achieve PHG concentrations would be expensive and, given current detection methods, may not be demonstrably effective at the PHG level. For lead, SFPUC emphasized its long‑running corrosion control program, component replacements (meters, curb stops) and public outreach, including school and childcare testing, as primary controls.

Public and commissioner input

Multiple public commenters urged the commission to hold workshops on the Tuolumne River voluntary agreement, the commission’s “design drought” assumptions and demand projections — subjects connected to broader water planning but separate from the PHG item. Commissioners asked staff for added transparency and earlier public posting of draft PHG reports; staff agreed to publish drafts on SFPUC’s website when the report is dispatched to the commission to increase public access.

What happens next

By approving the report, commissioners authorized staff to submit a certification letter to the State Water Resources Control Board documenting that the hearing occurred. Staff said the PHG report will remain a living document and that the utility will continue monthly monitoring and targeted programs (lead service line replacement, ozone optimization, blending) described in the presentation.

Speakers quoted or referenced at the hearing came from SFPUC staff and commission members and were limited to the names and roles recorded in the meeting transcript.","The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission on Thursday approved its 2025 San Francisco Water System Public Health Goal report and directed staff to notify the State Water Resources Control Board that a public hearing was held.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6474215,"Votes at a glance: SFPUC meeting actions",4131,3945000,8076000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62&start=3945&end=8076","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62/thumbnail_3945000.jpg","/articles/6474215/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/Votes-at-a-glance-SFPUC-meeting-actions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6474215-3f6f0774f301f4c039263bfe8d321765/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181342&Signature=atHhORHKAaJhaaohz3x3aowf28oPO9NHDBQovYaR2J5Pd0rzkwTIZJSRFdCGaXuIvhMMOKnH~mGLvnRmi3oWgrpHiVkaGJXgXM9JdDUjEOvNT5oUqzny0VA3dtYP2vtPA-~~SyyBNn5zYsCR-1zqMsJ-3lHcP14iVzMnTf0yA0yX-wNuxYYgMklLPHDeRWVwPnWxE1q55y5aTVl1T0p06Pjzs8qCGF8VT0UEuucwDb-4VGuPg7FJj5jtpkaJT4eNQXgzTxr4hXD~6LxEbJ5YuHxfGfE1964CH-NQUG6b-eXkezhUqkGoe9YuCSSMrqgjexCaeXwn113DFwzyKP94zg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission recorded multiple formal actions during its meeting. Below is a concise summary of each action, the outcome and key details. Votes listed reflect the roll‑call statements recorded in the meeting transcript. President Stacy presided; Vice President Arce was absent for several votes.

Item 6 — Consent calendar

- Action: Approve consent calendar.
- Outcome: Passed (President Stacy: Aye; Vice President Arce: absent; Commissioner Jamdar: Aye; Commissioner Levarone: Aye; Commissioner Thurlow: Aye).

Item 7 — San Francisco Water System 2025 Public Health Goal report

- Action: Approve the PHG report and direct staff to submit a certification letter to the State Water Resources Control Board documenting the public hearing.
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence). See the separate article for detail on contaminants and lead program progress.

Item 8 — Approve Cross Connection Control Plan and program manual

- Action: Approve draft plan and submit to the State Water Resources Control Board.
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence). The plan expands hazard assessments to all services and includes a multi‑decade timetable and pilot program.

Item 9 — Amend Section G (cross connection) of Rules and Regulations

- Action: Adopt amendments to Section G to implement cross‑connection program updates (record‑keeping, licensed plumber requirements, et cetera).
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence).

Item 10 — Amend professional services contracts (water enterprise)

- Action: Approve Amendment No. 2 to professional services contracts (Kennedy Jenks, AECOM JV, Woodard & Curran, Brown & Caldwell JV) increasing per‑contract authority from $5 million to $7.5 million (combined increase from $20M to $30M authorized across contracts).
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence).

Item 11 — Accept work and authorize final payment, Contract WW‑736 (Castro / Mission sewer improvements)

- Action: Accept work performed by contractor, authorize final payment and approve modification to extend contract duration for additional punch‑list and brick‑sewer CCTV work.
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence).

Item 12 — Increase contingency for contract WD‑2776 (Westside Recycled Water at Oceanside Plant)

- Action: Approve a $5 million increase to the contract contingency to cover extended overhead costs associated with negotiated delays and electrical/mechanical modifications following VFD failures.
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence).

Item 13 — Amend municipal advisory services contracts

- Action: Approve Amendment No. 1 to municipal advisory services agreements with Backstrom McCarley Berry; Montague Rose; and PFM Financial Advisors to increase available contract authority in light of expanded financing needs.
- Outcome: Passed (4–0 with one absence).

Notes: The vote counts above reflect the roll calls recorded in the transcript: President Stacy and Commissioners Jamdar, Levarone and Thurlow voted aye on recorded items; Vice President Arce was repeatedly recorded absent. For several items the motion and second were recorded without individual names listed in the transcript.","A summary of formal actions taken during the SFPUC meeting, including approvals for the 2025 Public Health Goal report, the cross‑connection control plan, contract amendments, and project closeout actions.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6474219,"Audit Bureau summarizes Q4 audits; PUC reports no findings in BLA review but has open recommendations",178,4064000,4242000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62&start=4064&end=4242","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62/thumbnail_4064000.jpg","/articles/6474219/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/Audit-Bureau-summarizes-Q4-audits-PUC-reports-no-findings-in-BLA-review-but-has-open-recommendations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6474219-a2e5f09d05b37bf006aece2ef92b9f98/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181342&Signature=LUzWEChIOvzj5CjlP41O0trLEu24q7pt4ph0W8lGURMkZ2piGej9BpEjXu93nOKcXWSj3lNWbW4AJ1QVgxeWTVV~c7yXEtKyoo~O20NflIfF-OrWtt592VVeqt~kqWnknCw~iPy5vPr7s8hiWvJGMrZ-BnfDuLy~OKAGmm9qSEIIDGl25tL--8lnZHZoq0pVmaG5eoVLLWPdxEClA008TIXlzrqhsg3jxt3~r5yfDWm4zVx-GY7Knx8vHoFMSUHpCw~E-EGX44XZJmbqexXWi7lCoXzpRVRuRr2Kf8D5Ucv~G5PyokJ0Ec8kWIqupY5~WLEuGhUIGeSKsBruyvHysw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Audit Bureau presented its quarterly audit and performance review for the fourth quarter ending June 30, 2025. Nancy Hamm, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant General Manager of Business Services, delivered the presentation on behalf of Audit Director Irela Blackwood.

Highlights from the report

- Audits completed and in progress: SFPUC reported 23 completed audits for the quarter (16 financial audits and 7 performance audits) and 14 audits in progress. The Audit Bureau listed 6 audits scheduled for the first quarter of the current fiscal year, principally financial and year‑end related matters.

- Spotlight: the Audit Bureau highlighted the Board of Supervisors Budget and Legislative Analyst (BLA) citywide audit of interdepartmental services work orders and performance management. That review covered fiscal years 2018–2023 and found control deficiencies and inefficiencies across citywide work orders, including planning and oversight, tracking of expenditures and carryforwards, and performance monitoring. Importantly, the BLA made 24 recommendations to city departments but identified no findings against the SFPUC specifically.

- SFPUC internal status: As of June 30, the PUC had 16 open audit recommendations across two open audits; Audit Bureau staff reported active monitoring and plans to close recommendations on a six-month cadence.

- Upcoming audits: The bureau listed upcoming work including revenue lease audits, bond audits, single audit work and LBE compliance checks and the annual warehouse physical inventory counts.

Public comment and response

A public speaker criticized the commission’s responsiveness to audit reports and urged longer public‑comment time; commissioners and staff reiterated commitment to implement audit recommendations and to monitor open items.

What’s next

Audit Bureau staff said they will continue to track and implement audit recommendations and return to the commission with updates. Commissioners offered no substantive changes to the presented schedule and accepted the report for review.","SFPUC’s Audit Bureau presented its quarterly audit and performance review for the fourth quarter ending June 30, 2025. The presentation noted 23 audits completed in the quarter, highlighted a Board of Supervisors Budget and Legislative Analyst (BLA) performance audit that found no PUC findings but issued recommendations to several city oversight",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6474224,"SFPUC increases contingency by $5 million for Westside recycled water treatment facility after VFD corrosion and delays",720,6875000,7595000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62&start=6875&end=7595","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5742414-2bbc66c4b8ba3a8e6611377924b70b62/thumbnail_6875000.jpg","/articles/6474224/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/SFPUC-increases-contingency-by-5-million-for-Westside-recycled-water-treatment-facility-after-VFD-corrosion-and-delays","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6474224-9433a91a596b15c781ce35415625496f/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181342&Signature=brOh0osKR8Z2qUwczIitAX7GOyHyTZu3tp87kSYbC5RuCLtuQSEcksiB0TfBnTT6Y-IxEYEfu32nDUKT6kdBGe46jX3utkzrV31QoRpgZ8Q2WSdjJA~kjg8gZayuI7~39ixfIAAHtFV29wUEWGFzws4KTM85Dc5CombPFJ8hDff3pq~dGXLDJ9fMa-IHDdBWr4zipaJq-uAVP2JJCKeA9-B6EcVrZC0RcofpRLBuN2YtOmGwJkrncffLLujljXw6lws-cWvFcHMWcN~ApxXdFOXiFfHTCwx4BAZIDlmYaOueUgivFmLqHEaYAvZCoQmMXfAeuuUZwEJPnbiJOPVp6A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission on Thursday approved a $5 million increase to the contract cost contingency for the Westside Recycled Water Treatment Facility at the Oceanside Plant (contract WD‑2776). Project staff said the funding increase will cover extended contractor overhead related to negotiated delays and equipment and mechanical/electrical changes needed after equipment failures were discovered during commissioning.

What happened: project staff described a major failure of reverse osmosis system variable frequency drives (VFDs) discovered during pre‑commissioning in 2023. SFPUC staff and an outside consultant concluded corrosion on the VFDs resulted from ventilation ducting that allowed moist air into electrical cabinets. Because most of the construction work under contract WD‑2776 was complete, staff contracted separately for replacement equipment and modifications rather than expand the original construction contract to perform the corrective work.

Costs and schedule

- SFPUC said replacement of the VFDs themselves is approximately $1.5 million and HVAC/ductwork modifications are roughly $0.5 million; the $5 million contingency request covers those changes plus negotiated contractor extended overhead related to delays and miscellaneous change orders.

- The project faced multiple delays during construction, including COVID‑related supply chain issues, parts long lead times for electrical and mechanical components, and contractor‑caused delays. The negotiated substantial completion date is 02/04/2025; administrative closeout work and corrective equipment replacement are still underway.

Commission action and context

Commissioners approved the contingency increase. Commissioner Levarone pressed staff on the cause of the failure; staff said the ductwork/ventilation design was defective and that Department of Public Works design elements were implicated. The commission voted to increase the contingency by $5 million to allow the contractor and the agency to finalize administrative closeout and corrective equipment replacement and to resume commissioning.

What’s next

Staff said it will complete equipment replacement, restart commissioning and continue administrative contract closeout work. The utility said it negotiated in good faith on concurrent delays and final overhead costs. The item passed with recorded ayes from President Stacy, Commissioner Jamdar, Commissioner Levarone and Commissioner Thurlow; Vice President Arce was absent.

Speakers recorded in the presentation included Barbara Palacios (Project Manager, Westside Enhanced Water Recycling Project) and follow‑up comments by senior water staff.","The commission approved a $5 million increase to the cost contingency for the Westside Recycled Water Treatment Facility at Oceanside Plant, citing failed variable frequency drives caused by ventilation design and multiple construction delays, including COVID‑era and supply chain impacts.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

SFPUC adopts revised cross‑connection control plan; hazard assessments to cover all services over 25 years

SFPUC approves 2025 Public Health Goal report; staff flags bromate, hexavalent chromium and lead concerns

Votes at a glance: SFPUC meeting actions

Audit Bureau summarizes Q4 audits; PUC reports no findings in BLA review but has open recommendations

SFPUC increases contingency by $5 million for Westside recycled water treatment facility after VFD corrosion and delays