Concerns over military influence on PFAS study results dominated the Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Committee meeting in New Mexico on September 2, 2025. Committee members expressed apprehension about the potential impact of military personnel on the study's findings regarding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) levels in the community.

One representative raised critical questions about the inclusion of military personnel in the study, suggesting that their higher exposure levels could skew the average results significantly. "Did we have military personnel that were in that study or were they excluded?" the representative asked, highlighting the need for clarity on how these individuals were categorized in the data. The committee was informed that the study did account for military personnel, distinguishing between civilians and those with military firefighting responsibilities.

Further discussions revealed a lack of national representative PFAS blood testing for military personnel, prompting calls for a more comprehensive study that includes samples from military bases. "We need a baseline of these are people who are on these bases," another member emphasized, advocating for a deeper investigation into the health impacts of PFAS exposure among military communities.

The meeting also touched on the implications of recent legislation requiring labeling for consumer products containing PFAS. Concerns were raised about enforcement and public awareness, with one member noting the prevalence of PFAS in everyday items. "It's in just about everything," they remarked, suggesting the need for a public resource to help consumers identify PFAS-free products.

As the committee concluded, the significance of these discussions was clear: the health implications of PFAS exposure, particularly for military personnel and their families, remain a pressing concern. The committee plans to pursue further studies and public education initiatives to address these critical issues moving forward.