Daven Hill Park Project Sparks Dispute Over Budget and Communication Transparency

September 02, 2025 | Clallam County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Daven Hill Park Project Sparks Dispute Over Budget and Communication Transparency
Concerns over transparency and project management took center stage at the Clallam County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting on September 2, 2025. A heated exchange highlighted frustrations regarding communication and decision-making processes related to park projects, particularly concerning a trail built for local resident Martha Ireland.

The discussion began when a board member raised issues about a persistent wet spot in the park during winter, prompting a conversation about potential solutions. However, tensions escalated as members expressed concerns about a lack of transparency regarding project approvals and budget allocations. One member claimed that the board had been sidelined, stating, "We've been sort of tricked into not being able to do the projects the board endorses."

In response, Parks Director Tom Mix defended his actions, clarifying that he had the authority to utilize funds for park trail repairs and developments without needing prior approval from the advisory board. "Just because you didn't know about it doesn't mean it was secret," he asserted, emphasizing that he was acting within his established authority.

The debate underscored a significant divide between board members and the department's leadership, with accusations of secrecy and miscommunication surfacing. As the meeting concluded, the need for improved dialogue and clearer processes was evident, leaving many to wonder how these issues will be addressed moving forward. The board's next steps remain uncertain, but the call for greater transparency in project management is likely to resonate in future discussions.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI