During the Clallam County Charter Review Commission Ethics Committee meeting on September 2, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding potential conflicts of interest and ethical violations within local governance. Public comments highlighted issues surrounding the conduct of officials during public testimony, particularly focusing on the actions of a supervisor from the conservation district.

One speaker expressed concern over Supervisor Bockart's participation in public testimony, arguing that her dual role as a conservation district supervisor and a public commenter created a conflict of interest. The speaker emphasized that public testimony should be given by individuals representing themselves as citizens unless they are officially appointed to speak on behalf of an agency. This situation raised questions about the integrity of public engagement and the need for clearer guidelines on how officials should participate in discussions that may affect their roles.

Another participant, John Worthington, echoed these concerns, pointing out that ethical standards were not upheld during the meeting. He claimed that decisions had been made prior to public testimony, undermining the purpose of the public comment period. Worthington also noted that violations of federal regulations occurred when certain individuals were not allowed to testify on resolutions affecting their organizations, further complicating the ethical landscape.

The discussions underscored the importance of transparency and accountability in local governance. The committee acknowledged the need to address these ethical concerns and ensure that public testimony is respected and valued in decision-making processes. As the meeting concluded, the committee members committed to reviewing the issues raised and considering necessary actions to uphold ethical standards in future meetings. This commitment reflects a proactive approach to fostering trust and integrity within Clallam County's governance.