New Mexico Committee Debates Risks of Brackish Water Desalination in House Bill 137

February 22, 2025 | Energy, Environment & Natural Resources, House of Representatives, Committees, Legislative, New Mexico


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

New Mexico Committee Debates Risks of Brackish Water Desalination in House Bill 137
The New Mexico Legislature's House Committee on Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources convened on February 22, 2025, to discuss critical issues surrounding water management, particularly focusing on a proposed bill concerning the commodification of brackish water. The meeting highlighted significant concerns from various stakeholders regarding the environmental and public health implications of the bill.

Key discussions centered on the economic development intentions behind the bill, which aims to explore the use of brackish water. However, several speakers voiced strong opposition, emphasizing that brackish water is classified as a public good. Concerns were raised about the potential risks associated with commodifying this resource without adequate scientific understanding or a proper legal framework. Alexandria Lyon from New Mexico No Fault Solutions stressed the importance of protecting public waters and the rights of local communities, including tribal groups, who may be affected by such initiatives.

Sky Johnson, representing a youth-led climate justice organization, echoed these sentiments, urging lawmakers to amend the bill to require comprehensive aquifer mapping before any desalination projects are authorized. Johnson pointed out that without this critical step, there could be severe consequences, including land subsidence and contamination of fresh groundwater. The speaker also highlighted the need for any desalination efforts to be powered by renewable energy and to include safe disposal plans for byproducts.

Further complicating the discussion, retired geophysics professor George Jurasic raised alarms about the potential for increased PFAS contamination in treated brackish water, referencing recent research that indicated high concentrations of these harmful substances in municipal wastewater systems. This finding underscored the need for caution in pursuing brackish water desalination without thorough scientific validation.

The meeting also addressed immediate water crises in rural communities, with testimonies from residents affected by severe water quality issues. One speaker described the dire situation in San Miguel County, where residents are facing extreme water emergencies, highlighting the urgent need for effective water management solutions.

In conclusion, the committee's discussions revealed a complex landscape of concerns regarding the proposed brackish water bill, emphasizing the necessity for careful planning and community consultation to ensure the protection of New Mexico's water resources. The next steps will likely involve further amendments to the bill to address these critical issues before any legislative action is taken.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Mexico articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI