Eagle Crest Recovery Ordinance Repeal Sparks Public Debate in Washington County

The Washington County Regular Quorum Court meeting on August 21, 2025, focused on a contentious ordinance concerning Eagle Crest, a recovery facility. The primary discussion revolved around a proposed repeal of the ordinance, which, if passed, would prevent the county from going to trial over the matter.

During the meeting, a judge highlighted the substantial probability that Eagle Crest would succeed in court if the case proceeded. This prompted discussions among court members about the implications of a yes vote, which would effectively repeal the ordinance and potentially resolve ongoing litigation. Concerns were raised about the financial repercussions of continuing the trial, with one member expressing apprehension about the costs involved.

Public comments featured a range of perspectives. Attorney Steve Zaga, representing local residents, argued against the ordinance, claiming it constituted special legislation favoring Eagle Crest. He warned that passing the repeal could set a precedent for future developers to challenge zoning laws, suggesting it would encourage further litigation against the county.

In contrast, Seth Haines, representing Eagle Crest, defended the facility's operations, emphasizing the importance of allowing residents to solidify their recovery. He argued that the repeal would align with federal laws, specifically the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, which require reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities.

The meeting concluded with a call for further public comments, indicating ongoing community engagement and concern regarding the ordinance and its implications for local governance and land use policies. The outcome of the vote on the repeal remains significant, as it could shape future interactions between the county and developers, as well as influence the treatment of recovery facilities within local zoning laws.