In a recent meeting of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (CUIAB), concerns were raised regarding the upcoming return-to-office mandate for administrative law judges (ALJs). The union representing these legal professionals expressed significant apprehension about the requirement for judges to be in the office four days a week, starting in July.

Union representatives highlighted that most hearings have been conducted virtually, demonstrating that remote work has not hindered productivity. They argued that the flexibility of telework has improved access for appellants, many of whom struggle to attend in-person hearings due to work commitments. The union pointed out that other state departments have adopted more flexible telework policies, questioning why CUIAB judges are being treated differently.

The representatives emphasized that the executive order mandating the return to the office allows for case-by-case exceptions based on operational needs. They urged the board to consider these exceptions, noting that many ALJs have been successfully working remotely and that a rigid return-to-office policy could negatively impact their work-life balance.

The discussion underscored a broader concern about the treatment of CUIAB judges compared to their peers in other state agencies, who may continue to enjoy telework options. The union's plea reflects a desire for equitable treatment and recognition of the unique operational needs of the CUIAB.

In response, board members acknowledged the importance of the judges' contributions and expressed a commitment to finding a resolution that accommodates both operational requirements and the well-being of the staff. The meeting concluded with a promise to continue discussions on this pressing issue, as the board seeks to balance the needs of the agency with the concerns of its employees.