Become a Founder Member Now!

Neighbors Oppose Whitney Development Citing Bad Faith and Privacy Violations

October 17, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Neighbors Oppose Whitney Development Citing Bad Faith and Privacy Violations
The recent San Francisco City Commission meeting highlighted significant community concerns regarding a proposed development project on Whitney Street. Residents voiced strong opposition, citing issues of design compliance, privacy, and a perceived lack of good faith in negotiations between the developer and the community.

Mary Anne Tologany, representing the owners of a neighboring property, criticized the project for not adhering to established design guidelines. She pointed out the irony of addressing planning code violations at the project site by potentially creating new violations for adjacent properties. Tologany emphasized that there has been insufficient dialogue between the developer and the neighbors, arguing that meaningful discussions have not occurred, which she believes should be a prerequisite for project approval.

Adam Cross, a resident living adjacent to the proposed site, echoed these sentiments, raising concerns about privacy and the misuse of California's SB 330 legislation. He argued that the law, intended to address the housing crisis, is being exploited by developers to bypass essential affordability and zoning regulations. Cross accused the developers of acting in bad faith, alleging unpermitted construction activities and misleading neighbors about the project's scope.

The meeting underscored the community's desire for transparency and genuine engagement in the development process. As discussions continue, residents are calling for a reevaluation of the project to ensure that their concerns are adequately addressed before any approvals are granted. The commission's next steps will be crucial in determining the future of the proposed development and its impact on the surrounding neighborhood.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal