Colorado's Prescribed Burn Associations Face Barriers as Rural Needs Emerge

In a recent meeting of the Colorado Forest Health Council, discussions centered around the pressing issue of prescribed burn associations, or the lack thereof, in the state. As participants gathered, the atmosphere was charged with concern over the absence of these associations, which are prevalent in many other states. One member noted, “I have never heard of one in Colorado except in this conversation,” highlighting a significant gap in the state's forest management strategy.

The council members expressed a collective curiosity about why prescribed burn associations are not more common in Colorado. One participant pointed out that initial recommendations to investigate this issue had seemingly fallen by the wayside, leaving many questions unanswered. “Why aren’t they happening, and are there barriers?” they pondered, suggesting that liability concerns might be a significant factor.

As the conversation unfolded, it became clear that the absence of these associations could hinder effective fire management across the state. Members emphasized the need for a tailored approach, particularly for rural communities, where existing regulations may not align with local practices. One commissioner passionately advocated for the importance of considering rural Colorado's unique circumstances, warning against overreach that could impose unnecessary regulations on smaller counties.

The dialogue also touched on the potential of pile burning as a practical solution. Mark Morgan, participating via Zoom, suggested that increasing pile burning activities could help build public confidence in prescribed burns. “You have to have a track record that you can do this,” he stated, emphasizing that successful pile burning could serve as a stepping stone toward broader acceptance of prescribed burns.

The council recognized that while the U.S. Forest Service maintains jurisdiction over federal lands, the focus of their discussions was on non-federal lands, particularly private properties. This distinction is crucial, as many homeowners currently navigate a patchwork of regulations that can complicate their ability to conduct controlled burns.

As the meeting drew to a close, the overarching sentiment was clear: there is a pressing need for a more cohesive strategy regarding prescribed burns in Colorado. The council members left with a renewed commitment to explore the barriers to establishing prescribed burn associations and to advocate for legislative changes that would better support local fire management efforts. The future of Colorado's forests may depend on these discussions, as the state grapples with the dual challenges of wildfire risk and forest health.