Boerne Board of Adjustments Deliberates RV Code Enforcement and Fence Variance

August 20, 2025 | Boerne, Kendall County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Boerne Board of Adjustments Deliberates RV Code Enforcement and Fence Variance
During the Boerne Zoning Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting on August 20, 2025, a contentious discussion unfolded regarding a resident's request for a variance to build an eight-foot fence, primarily driven by concerns over a neighboring RV that some residents believe violates city codes.

The meeting highlighted a significant divide between residents and city officials over the enforcement of local ordinances. One resident expressed frustration, stating, "If the code isn't being enforced, that's an issue," referring to the RV parked near their home. This sentiment resonated with several board members, who questioned the city's commitment to enforcing its own regulations. A board member noted, "It seems like this is a conversation between these folks and the city to try and figure out what's supposed to go on with that RV."

The crux of the debate centered on whether the RV should be classified as a "junk vehicle" under city definitions, which would necessitate its removal. However, city representatives indicated that the RV was not in violation, complicating the residents' appeal for a variance. One board member remarked, "If the RV wasn't there, would you be seeking a variance on the fence height? No."

As discussions progressed, board members acknowledged the need for clarity on the city's enforcement policies. They debated whether to approve the variance request or to table the decision until further information could be gathered regarding the RV's status. The board ultimately recognized that the presence of the RV was a significant factor in the variance request, with one member stating, "If we were to make a decision today, it would be a permanent decision."

The meeting concluded with the board considering the implications of their decision, emphasizing the importance of addressing the underlying issues with city enforcement before moving forward with the variance. The board's next steps remain uncertain, as they weigh the need for further investigation against the residents' immediate concerns.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI