[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6480701,"mediaKeyId","5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8","parentId",5609479,"title","Council reopens discussion, approves parking agreement at 8241 North Shore Trail","audioSeconds",1404,"startMs",1426000,"endMs",2830000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8&start=1426&end=2830","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8/thumbnail_1426000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6480701/Forest-Lake-City/Washington-County/Minnesota/Council-reopens-discussion-approves-parking-agreement-at-8241-North-Shore-Trail","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6480701-55af98e8c6af39203a54e928dfab6962/orig.mp4?Expires=1770448201&Signature=Wem7RSFmD2I-gz15Pj0AoXWcfmDuVj9GFdOR4UcsHWLgtJzftQ7gS5EabmRcS57d7iecpmd5GwS2a6an86jCKN8Pc8CrGBw8-q5wHpEkzcXME9PLRmPOP3VxN8v5DBFzRxQiAixr-41dODrZUH1wrL8ZqWx6TxGQi3Q82uEGJqvJYyYeUNX291twUh32F8Xrawo3vKolZ9ARSodtC0y38UWCE~yKZ3amFqKurX0mzdoP5DTcoSZvRjDXWYwGxeYyrUq0BMr3AQjThAOSRNAB3Hk3rd1xLwOOT-jav2uTNQsj6R~ELOncRyYZB-q8WqhIzFyDcWIzNiUwsn7m5igHww__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Forest Lake City","date","2025-07-30T00:00:00Z","article","The Forest Lake City Council reopened discussion on parallel parking at 8241 North Shore Trail and approved an agreement with the adjacent property owner to install parallel parking at that location. The council recorded a roll-call vote on the final motion: Council Member Erickson — Aye; Council Member Larson — No; Council Member Miller — No; Council Member Valento — Aye; Mayor Roberts — Aye. The motion carried, 3–2.

Council members debated whether approving the parking would reward property owners who had placed material and used the public right-of-way without prior city permission. One council member said allowing the improvement after the owner placed aggregate in the right-of-way would appear to “reward bad behavior”; another argued the parking addresses an existing need and that the city has allowed parallel parking in other busier corridors. The city attorney noted there was new information since the prior vote: the city does not currently have an ordinance prohibiting parking on North Shore Trail, and without an ordinance the posted “no parking” signs are not enforceable by police; that fact could justify reconsideration of the prior vote.

Staff reported the adjacent property owner has executed the proposed agreement and indicated a willingness to pay for the improvement; council retained the agreement language that allows the owner to seek Economic Development Authority (EDA) support. The council discussed possible alternatives such as limiting spots to employees, restoring “no parking” signage more broadly, and conducting a larger discussion about parking policy along the lake road.

The approved motion directed staff to proceed with the agreement as written (including the possibility of EDA assistance) and to return to the council with any required implementing documents and signage or ordinance language if council later decides to adopt an enforceable prohibition. Staff noted the potential for spillover parking if the council instead restores a broad no-parking designation for the corridor and said a separate workshop on the wider North Shore Trail parking policy would be appropriate.

The meeting transcript shows the council reopened the topic via a prevailing-member motion to reconsider and then voted on a motion to enter the agreement with the owner of 8241 North Shore Trail; the recorded roll-call vote followed the motion.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Forest Lake City Council July 29th, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","After reopening a previously defeated motion, the Forest Lake City Council approved an agreement with the adjacent property owner at 8241 North Shore Trail to install parallel parking at the owner's expense; the council approved the motion in a roll-call vote, 3–2.","taxTitle","Forest Lake City, Washington County, Minnesota","taxId",54112,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6480705,"Council accepts public works space-needs study, authorizes schematic design contract",535,880000,1415000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8&start=880&end=1415","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8/thumbnail_880000.jpg","/articles/6480705/Forest-Lake-City/Washington-County/Minnesota/Council-accepts-public-works-space-needs-study-authorizes-schematic-design-contract","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6480705-259ed8d966593bdd8ac7bde47ea0d55a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770448201&Signature=lYcEkDX-Ayy0yiap-FJFeVc5iuukXa3tnW-VdUvgNeLt6A6c3kiD07oNFsDWies-7P1RsMRqELhpfHiDLvcbNwL-mQtd0ASDmRy7Z6IEFu0xQOQ9Lp0ZLLjdYr809pJ57LElGzRz97Un-QTBNHaop2pSPaOjilaG~jeHbNCxmb7u0pmUwXEqzi35-JNPL7v5MMGInbGMNe2BY42h1xP-GM-HYJJhPh1eESl7Of0zb60iMaCVvQNUo4yxI0I~ayDEgyP9h70DbTiA2AV~3PSnOpspbHIzBtZCK3NhOHKHqHpI94m2hn~SfPxrlhhdsCurRDnRdtz5O6Bve2JSJz2jOw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Forest Lake City Council accepted a final space-needs study for a new Public Works facility and authorized staff to execute a schematic design contract with Wold Architects & Engineers for the city-owned site on Highway 61 and 200 and Second Street with a fee not to exceed $321,000, inclusive of expenses.

Mark (city staff) presented the study and outlined the phased design approach. He said the schematic design phase will provide greater detail on site layout, cost estimates, and design choices and that staff can stop the process after the schematic phase if the council chooses. Mark said staff and consultants believe the chosen site is appropriate and noted potential to reserve about 3.5 to 5 acres of the northwest corner of the site for taxable redevelopment, subject to further planning.

Council members said they have reviewed the project in previous workshops and expressed support for moving to design. One council member said the current Public Works buildings include structures from the 1950s and noted safety and staffing needs as drivers for the project.

The council voted to accept the space-needs study and later voted to authorize staff to sign a contract with Wold Architects & Engineers to perform schematic design services for the city's future public works building, with a not-to-exceed fee of $321,000. Staff said the fee is a significant investment but necessary to reach a level of design that will produce reliable cost estimates and site details. The council discussed that schematic design does not commit the city to construction and remains an investigatory phase. No specific funding source for later construction phases was approved at the meeting.","The council accepted a space-needs study for a new public works building and authorized a contract with Wold Architects & Engineers for schematic design services at a fee not to exceed $321,000, moving the project into a more detailed design phase.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6480710,"Council approves easement vacation, amends developer agreement for Forest Hills Preserve",647,190000,837000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8&start=190&end=837","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5609479-5ad7d49bebcd3db1dc89dda6ddd289d8/thumbnail_190000.jpg","/articles/6480710/Forest-Lake-City/Washington-County/Minnesota/Council-approves-easement-vacation-amends-developer-agreement-for-Forest-Hills-Preserve","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6480710-2eb14458050c7890e7fc247454b59d4b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770448201&Signature=eYadr1Z2C8XiX8Q~SLtj50mnq~lASEp0sjU8a6CQgHEcBcsANmc7LHuPwfuYa6Vg6Haeaw2QG-ijNUnLbqSYRWlXlVCq~s6uO0cww30HUTpzxtkulfULy6OB2QpoLMBxHdL0~i8yOY6KfeL3jN5zUZLtdyjhLI1ekdqpauXPWB1eaOKf8BBoUHVB3Po4Ua~FnjmSLgD2g2buRv8grjYRrgYfO3HqGMMefcCegWmtC6u2crNNx4ojr1F2ZIhhxDEkuq4cQmB6lVm3Zpyq3-RRrIisrRPrvzYxvUMcnX8qJ1FQ0DryCGXZHvN-laTovLHaS41ftU0gPJdwKgagm-U6gw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Forest Lake City Council on an evening meeting conditionally approved a resolution to vacate certain recorded drainage and utility easements in the Forest Hills Preserve subdivision and approved the first amendment to the development agreement with Jay Johnson Development LLC, city staff said.

City staff told the council the changes resolve grading that was implemented outside the platted easement and put the drainage conveyance into a legally recorded easement that follows the existing drainage pattern and conveys stormwater to the regional retention pond. Abby (city staff) told the council the request includes vacating the old easement, approving a revised grading plan, and accepting a new drainage and utility easement encumbering five properties; staff identified the package as Resolution No. 07292507.

During the public hearing, resident Mary Fowler Wachols of Lot 6 asked how the revised easement would differ from current conditions. Mary Fowler Wachols said, “It naturally goes there. So how would this be different?” Abby (city staff) replied that the change would not alter existing conditions on her property and was intended to align the recorded easement with the way the developer actually graded the lots: “It won't change the existing conditions of your property. This is an existing developed property. It's just, solidifying the grading plan and that ravine … where the water is draining through.” The city engineer (Ryan) explained the new easement more closely follows the tree line where the drainage is actually occurring and protects that corridor from future obstructions.

Council members asked whether the amendment would expand the easement to cover five properties rather than the previously recorded four; staff said grading extended the conveyance toward the western lot, so the revised easement needs to include that lot to ensure continuous flow to the regional pond. After closing the public hearing, the council voted to conditionally approve Resolution No. 07292507 and then voted to approve the first amendment to the development contract for Forest Hills Preserve with Jay Johnson Development LLC. Both motions carried.

City staff said the amendment formalizes existing conditions created during development and will allow the city to enforce the drainage corridor in its current location. Staff offered to follow up with the resident who raised yard-saturation concerns to determine if additional corrective actions tied to permits or the development agreement are appropriate.

The record at the meeting shows the council acted on the resolution and the development agreement amendment during the same agenda segment; neither vote was completed as a roll-call tally in the transcript excerpt provided.","The Forest Lake City Council conditionally approved a resolution to vacate recorded drainage and utility easements in Forest Hills Preserve and approved a first amendment to the development agreement with Jay Johnson Development LLC to reflect revised grading and new easements.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council reopens discussion, approves parking agreement at 8241 North Shore Trail

Council accepts public works space-needs study, authorizes schematic design contract

Council approves easement vacation, amends developer agreement for Forest Hills Preserve