The Kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board (BSRB) held a pivotal meeting on August 12, 2025, where discussions centered on the potential removal of the postdoctoral training requirement for licensed psychologists. This proposal, supported by several prominent figures in the field, aims to address the growing workforce crisis in mental health services across the state.

Dr. Brenton Clark, chair of the psychology department at Wichita State University, opened the discussion by sharing insights from his experience in Alabama, where no postdoctoral year is mandated. He argued that early-career psychologists in Alabama are just as competent as their Kansas counterparts, suggesting that the current requirement may be unnecessary. Dr. Clark emphasized the quality of training provided through existing PhD programs and internships, asserting that the supervision received during these stages is sufficient for preparing graduates for independent practice.

Dr. Jessica Provine, assistant vice president for wellness at Wichita State, echoed these sentiments, highlighting the historical significance of their accredited internship program, which has been operational since 1953. She expressed concern over the closure of several internship programs in the region, which she believes jeopardizes the pipeline of trained psychologists entering the workforce. Dr. Provine advocated for the removal of the postdoctoral requirement, arguing that it would allow for quicker licensure and better retention of graduates within Kansas, ultimately benefiting the community by increasing access to mental health services.

Dr. Jason Maloshek, president of the Kansas Psychological Association, also supported the proposal, noting that neighboring states have successfully eliminated the postdoctoral year without negative consequences. He pointed out that the current system delays entry into the workforce, which is critical given the pressing demand for mental health professionals. Maloshek emphasized the importance of maintaining rigorous training standards while also adapting to the evolving needs of the community.

The discussions highlighted a consensus among the speakers that the existing postdoctoral requirement may hinder the ability to attract and retain qualified psychologists in Kansas. They argued that restructuring the licensure process could enhance job placement rates for graduates and ensure that the state is better equipped to meet the mental health needs of its residents.

As the meeting concluded, the board members were encouraged to consider the implications of this potential change, which could significantly impact the future of psychological practice in Kansas. The proposed removal of the postdoctoral requirement is seen as a crucial step toward strengthening the mental health workforce and improving access to care for the community.