Senate Committee Rejects Senator Murphy's Amendment on Civil Rights Enforcement in Higher Education

July 31, 2025 | Appropriations: Senate Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate Committee Rejects Senator Murphy's Amendment on Civil Rights Enforcement in Higher Education
The U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations convened on July 31, 2025, to conduct a Full Committee Markup of the Defense and Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Acts. The meeting featured a significant discussion surrounding an amendment proposed by Senator Murphy, which aimed to address concerns related to civil rights violations on college campuses, particularly regarding antisemitism.

Senator Capito opened the discussion by expressing strong opposition to Murphy's amendment. She highlighted the troubling rise of antisemitism on campuses, particularly in the Northeast, and criticized the previous administration's inaction in addressing these issues. Capito emphasized the importance of the Office of Civil Rights and argued that halting its investigations would be detrimental, especially at a time when Jewish students feel unsafe.

Senator Assoff, identifying as a Jewish member of the committee, echoed Capito's sentiments, condemning the administration's handling of the situation as exploitative. He expressed concern that the amendment was a tactic to impose control over higher education institutions.

In contrast, Senator Merck supported the amendment, stating that it simply required the Office of Inspector General to certify that enforcement actions against colleges comply with existing laws. He urged fellow committee members to vote in favor of the amendment.

Following the discussions, a roll call vote was conducted. The results showed 14 votes in favor and 15 against the amendment, leading to its rejection. The committee's decision reflects ongoing tensions regarding civil rights enforcement in higher education and the broader implications for student safety and institutional accountability.

The meeting concluded without further amendments being discussed, leaving the committee to proceed with its agenda on appropriations for defense and health services.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments