Lemont Residents Oppose Gas Station Annexation Over Environmental and Safety Concerns

The Lemont Village Board meeting held on August 11, 2025, was marked by intense community opposition regarding a proposed gas station and car wash project near residential areas. The meeting began with discussions about the implications of a potential annexation of property adjacent to the Hindu temple, which had previously been denied by the board. Residents expressed concerns about the lack of transparency and communication from the board regarding this project.

Several community members voiced their dissent, highlighting the potential negative impacts of the gas station on local traffic, safety, and the environment. Laura, a resident, emphasized that the proposed site is close to homes and schools, raising fears about increased crime and traffic accidents. She noted that over 400 signatures had been collected from residents opposing the project, reflecting widespread discontent.

Maria Elena Cordova, another long-time resident, urged the board to reconsider the project, citing environmental concerns and the potential for water contamination. She criticized the tactics used by the gas station's representatives, suggesting they had a history of bypassing community input in similar situations.

Elizabeth Esparza added to the concerns by discussing the limited access points in the neighborhood, which could exacerbate traffic issues. She also submitted a petition against the gas station, further illustrating the community's unified stance.

Robert Peterson raised alarms about the safety of children in the area, linking the gas station's proximity to I-55 with increased risks of human trafficking and accidents. He vowed that residents would actively oppose any further steps toward the gas station's approval.

Other speakers echoed these sentiments, with many expressing a deep emotional connection to their community and a desire to maintain its character. Concerns about property values, environmental degradation, and the overall safety of the neighborhood were recurrent themes throughout the meeting.

The board acknowledged the residents' frustrations and promised to address the issues raised, particularly regarding the need for transparency and public engagement in future discussions. The meeting concluded with a commitment to consider the community's feedback as they move forward with the annexation and zoning decisions.