[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6588708,"mediaKeyId","5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102","parentId",5558894,"title","Votes at a glance: Edmond City Council meeting — actions and outcomes","audioSeconds",10175,"startMs",17000,"endMs",10192000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102&start=17&end=10192","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102/thumbnail_17000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6588708/Edmond/Oklahoma-County/Oklahoma/Votes-at-a-glance-Edmond-City-Council-meeting-actions-and-outcomes","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6588708-5cc7fc66b320c2fba79f6963ad1b817a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770929745&Signature=iGzN-u3Dubt0oEQDHVIIsMEjRXeYZ~8wyTQqzvXMStxQcDCKRGawDO8vw6P83VWTSqHJH-8HPOLOM9ZIjUhFDcpuQqQclSNQ7DOFRUNLLchR62yU7qs21BFqTJfVfGCTX5D-gsM15C1~~VYnEcdAao4Hyg1fz7W0-4R1LcYeZCgN6U7KEM8B~R4dI8v1JTud9TAtDU6JL2EKpqLNGQaJZkUb4AdhpCSrs1G~iK2peX52xj76vk~sgt8ZDoyv7iVsKhHIBuhK08oM96Ou3u9S2dqlIHXN94VYbmw5N~7~ifqDF~m2j-I1M27y-hlxI6cY5cD0BlK~-ANMObZub~3HNg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Edmond","date","2025-08-11T00:00:00Z","article","Below are the formal actions taken during the Edmond City Council meeting (motions and recorded votes as reflected in the public transcript). Each item lists the motion and the recorded outcome. This summary does not replace ordinances, resolutions or official minutes.

- Appointments and reappointments (Item 2): Motion to accept five appointments — Motion passed, vote recorded 5-0.

- Edmond Public Works Authority general consent: Four items approved after two items were pulled for individual consideration — Motion passed 5-0.

- Public Works Authority: Item 4B — Approval of agreement with Edmond Economic Development Authority for FY25 funding ($784,284) — Motion passed 5-0.

- Public Works Authority: Item 4F — Lease matters for 7 North Broadway (encumber funds $14,975/month; $59,000 FY25‑26) — Motion to encumber funds passed 5-0; separate motion to continue approval of termination of the lease passed 5-0 (termination deferred).

- City council general consent: Motion to approve consent items except items B and Q — Motion passed 5-0; typographical correction to July 14 minutes approved (change of word “for” to “or”) — Motion passed 5-0.

- University District plan (Item 8B): Resolution No. 30-25, adopting the University District plan — Motion to adopt as presented — Motion passed 5-0.

- Safe Fleet Mobile Vision, Inc. (Item 8C / 9C): Waiver of competitive bids and sole‑source purchase (police video equipment and storage) — Purchase of equipment and services totaling $248,560 approved after council acknowledged proprietary vendor and waived competitive bidding — Motions passed 5-0.

- Sign variance (Case VA25-6, 2101 N. Santa Fe): Variance to allow a ground sign in right‑of‑way — Planning Commission recommended approval; Council motion approved 5-0.

- 7Brew (SP2400021 / PR24‑026): Site plan and final plat for drive‑through coffee at Edmond Road & Kelly Avenue — Planning Commission recommended approval; Council approved site plan and final plat — Motions passed 5-0.

- Liberty Park preliminary plat (PR24‑00027): Preliminary plat for mixed residential neighborhood north of Coffee Creek and Coltrane (≈86 acres) with multiple variances for street, alley and utility dimensions — Planning Commission recommended approval (3-1); Council approved preliminary plat — Motion passed 5-0. Council discussion emphasized private‑street maintenance responsibilities and phasing of western portions.

- Rezoning (Case Z2500016 / Ordinance No. 4047): Rezoning at 648 Hiwassee Road from GA (general agriculture) to R1 (rural estate) — Planning Commission recommended approval; Council approved — Motion passed 5-0.

- Comprehensive plan amendment (Case PA25‑one / Ordinance No. 4048): 1421 East Covell changed from rural neighborhood to suburban infill — Public comment raised traffic, tree and compatibility concerns; Council approved — Motion passed 5-0.

- Flood map update (Ordinance No. 4049): Amendment to municipal code to update areas of special flood hazard per FEMA map updates — Motion to amend code approved 5-0.

- Public Works Committee ordinance (Ordinance No. 4050) and related resolution (Res. No. 31-25): Council adopted ordinance establishing committee structure and dissolved the prior resolution-based committee; motions passed 5-0.

- Office of the Mayor and Council (Ordinance No. 4051): Creation of an Office of the Mayor and Council and a position of assistant to the mayor and council — Motion passed 5-0.

- Executive session follow-up (Item 10B): Council authorized the city attorney to initiate proceedings at the Oklahoma Corporation Commission relative to the Northwest Edmond unit — Motion passed 5-0.

Notes and context: Unless specified above, approvals described were motions to approve items as presented by staff or as modified during discussion. Several items (notably the Covell/Bryant plan amendment and Liberty Park plat) drew extended public comment and follow‑up directions (additional neighborhood outreach, engineering review or mitigation measures). Approvals of plan amendments do not themselves rezone property or grant building permits; subsequent applications will follow separate public processes.

If you need a specific ordinance/resolution/contract number or the transcript block supporting any entry above, staff can provide official minutes and document links.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Edmond - City Council Aug 11, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","A concise roundup of formal motions and votes from the Edmond City Council meeting on July 22, including appointments, development approvals, ordinance changes and administrative items.","taxTitle","Edmond, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma","taxId",2681,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6588713,"Council approves FY25 funding to Edmond EDA and encumbers lease funds; lease termination postponed",558,144000,702000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102&start=144&end=702","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102/thumbnail_144000.jpg","/articles/6588713/Edmond/Oklahoma-County/Oklahoma/Council-approves-FY25-funding-to-Edmond-EDA-and-encumbers-lease-funds-lease-termination-postponed","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6588713-cd77f72abaee39ee0a1e9e0031416550/orig.mp4?Expires=1770929745&Signature=kuCes1zaxEnqOqQJ43cDp70p1SvM8ywrH0YUkjJg6akROAs1XRHW88a9rYYmZ~JdyFrFqM6kpqnOASH-m8fX--g5YTII7rWSgN4gkM6fFK9XIfGzA3b-PaVVuh3z9fm5ZxmFZIG55FqyUei9VItvfZbHd2S-Zz238rfwpcUny0uLN107PGhw81V7PWXZe9AdUqhg2eJf8PAaTdNyirIJ0sGdmMwvsoVnzjtIFnBfLDHM1YefLkAgnJX2X2Dpmkn1R4yJI~U74mNeRZOSm-KCUO83tV8T7AWrWO0WxSPB2BI1NT~aGb8AHkpE4yYRaT3BdwVAkhsketrFPjlElQy8hQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Edmond City Council unanimously approved several items related to economic development and a city lease on July 22.

Funding for the Edmond Economic Development Authority (EEDA): Council approved allocation of $784,284 for fiscal year 2025 to support the EEDA, an amount council members described as important but not “optimal” for the city’s size. Staff and council noted the EEDA is developing strategic plans to recruit new businesses and support existing firms; the council also praised interim EEDA director Jennifer Springer for her work during the transition to a new executive director.

Spearman Investments lease: On a separate item concerning a city office lease at 7 North Broadway, the council authorized encumbering funds for a lease with Spearman Investments at $14,975 per month (totaling $59,000 for FY25‑26) but voted to continue approval of termination of the existing lease. City staff said the city is required to give 90 days’ notice to the landlord and that discussions are ongoing with the Department of Public Safety and the county clerk’s office about keeping some tenant offices at that location under an expanded footprint.

Multiple council members said they supported encumbering funds to ensure continuity of service while asking staff and the mayor to return with a more solidified plan before terminating the existing lease. “I’m okay with moving forward with encumbering the funds… I don't feel comfortable terminating the lease at this time,” one councilmember said during deliberations (remarks recorded in the meeting record).

Council approved the EEDA funding item and the lease encumbrance by recorded votes of 5-0. The council separately voted 5-0 to continue consideration of terminating the lease after 10/31/2025, effectively postponing final termination until the city has more complete lease agreements or plans for tenant relocation.

Council discussion on the EEDA funding also included strategic context: members expressed concern about regional retail competition from Oklahoma City and referenced the need for the EEDA to develop diversified revenue streams. One councilmember cited Denton, Texas as an example of an incentive strategy, noting that that city reported a substantial return on past incentive investments; councilmembers emphasized the need for careful ROI analysis for any incentives.

Next steps: Staff said the city will continue negotiations with the landlord and potential tenants, formalize any agreement terms and return to council with lease documents for approval. EEDA will continue strategic planning and present follow‑up items to council as projects and financing proposals develop.","Council approved $784,284 in FY25 funding for the Edmond Economic Development Authority and authorized encumbering $59,000 for an office lease with Spearman Investments, while voting to continue consideration of terminating the lease until plans are more solidified.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6588718,"Council approves controversial plan amendment at Covell and Bryant after residents voice safety, tree and character concerns",1118,5902000,7020000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102&start=5902&end=7020","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102/thumbnail_5902000.jpg","/articles/6588718/Edmond/Oklahoma-County/Oklahoma/Council-approves-controversial-plan-amendment-at-Covell-and-Bryant-after-residents-voice-safety-tree-and-character-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6588718-bcf677c4ecd1bd88d310f8a24fa60741/orig.mp4?Expires=1770929745&Signature=XR3GD4Iej2OYh6o8GxUFu2gC3SJ0zd8cmQS8glHvopxOfKHRB-6PLTyaKOngV-s2bFl1io2yK0koC0RcfyGzb~3rNfbGCJAJ3RYKcEy2H5wGblL4xKGrLLoRi6h6ed8ZTrSrv9kkgShvBcLPCunEi81LoZfep0DkoJOK8E5sKDy2qYQbOPQ2dorjnHiwtX4qwXERSqRmM~34UALRvusl8-kVVFYsdV8~CWmO1yVmW84Zxb6VsDoMIeaMots22KVJWXx~LIW9ZDVWalpFtXfunDgDt17rlhVFrk~b63t-JdNzvWi~MQ11haGNaidEyveaRkxz9fSrqGdB6wPi5HRRXQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Edmond City Council on July 22 approved Ordinance No. 4048, a comprehensive‑plan amendment (PA25‑one) changing the plan designation for 1421 East Covell from “rural neighborhood” to “suburban infill.” The vote was 5-0.

The amendment clears the way for future applications that could increase residential density on the 1.5‑acre property; it does not itself rezone the site nor approve any specific site plan. The council and staff repeatedly reminded listeners that rezoning, platting and site plan approvals would come later and require additional public notice and hearings.

The applicant and owner described a project concept of townhomes and duplexes that would amount to 16 units on the 1.5‑acre parcel. “We’re talking about duplex, quadplex and a couple of 5‑plex units — 16 lots on an acre and a half,” Greg Massey, the applicant’s representative, told the council. Owner Barry Hutchison described plans for two‑story, brick townhomes and said the project would include an 80‑foot buffer area and onsite amenities.

Neighbors urged denial and described longstanding concerns about traffic, safety and compatibility with surrounding acreage lots. “My most pressing concern is Edmond intentionally left the people in my neighborhood out of discussions for this project,” said one longtime resident who said she has lived four blocks north of Ayers for 31 years. Several neighbors told the council they had not received advance materials and asked for more direct outreach.

Speakers repeatedly raised the safety of the Covell/Bryant intersection. Victor Perez, who lives across Bryant from the site, told the council he sampled traffic at noon and counted “75 cars went by in five minutes,” a figure he used to emphasize the existing volume and hazard at the intersection. Other residents described blind spots caused by topography and tree cover and said the area currently lacks sidewalks and pedestrian signals.

Opponents also raised property‑value and character concerns. “This apartment will bring in increased noise…our neighbors’ privacy will be gone,” said Mary Epps Welch, who lives near the site. Several speakers asked the council to preserve large yards, mature trees and the existing low‑density character of the northeast Edmond neighborhoods.

Planning staff said the availability (or potential extension) of public water and sewer makes the suburban‑infill category appropriate for the 1.5‑acre site and noted that the proposed change is consistent with citywide goals to provide additional housing types where infrastructure permits. At the planning commission hearing in June a motion to approve had failed on a 2-2 vote; planning staff recommended approval to the city council.

Council members debated outreach and timing but emphasized that a plan amendment simply permits consideration of denser housing types; it does not grant development entitlements. Several council members urged the applicant and staff to conduct additional neighborhood meetings before any rezoning or site plan is filed.

After discussion, the council moved to approve the plan change. The ordinance does not itself authorize construction; any subsequent rezoning, plat or site‑plan applications will be subject to review, conditions and public comment.","Despite lengthy public opposition over traffic, tree preservation and neighborhood character, the Edmond City Council voted 5-0 to approve a comprehensive‑plan change (PA25‑one) that allows suburban‑infill development at 1421 East Covell; proponents say it enables more housing options and future infrastructure improvements.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6588722,"Edmond council adopts University District plan to guide redevelopment between UCO and downtown",3225,1001000,4226000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102&start=1001&end=4226","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5558894-08e6b5d486f66f3edd2a4b77b639c102/thumbnail_1001000.jpg","/articles/6588722/Edmond/Oklahoma-County/Oklahoma/Edmond-council-adopts-University-District-plan-to-guide-redevelopment-between-UCO-and-downtown","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6588722-bc8ce072e23448190adf7b62056344c5/orig.mp4?Expires=1770929745&Signature=gniKucWPX12ceobpmm3E9WsTSAYLSDqon4q7xKtg3rYkOSLcBxYi4VKy-F9VzRcLBH9rtzzNUL1-y3QLH4B0UdtI1Y0hUu4RvIpGXbDwkjAMa6vJHYVxohNIPm-fyD0eecTC9YsYemzdPpwbIl2CSOo-4Ur8Yq9R8egy~QMkyUMkmGZ70vCkDL0JkbIIGgK-PdmljD2mXpHhjbjaAiGHJsc5LUW5O3ZhM3AmwWqePPJ7bFvkFPGgfmb2P5jwHQhdMG7JJYZg98hmdyO1qGhsj2vtJfoeGPMYmBBYZYhtmOzL1565JA~xfwmYf3Qrp08SOq0p0sUjuNiEEemEWoNGfQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Edmond City Council on July 22 adopted Resolution No. 30-25 to formalize the University District plan, a yearlong planning effort developed with the University of Central Oklahoma and the Edmond Economic Development Authority (EEDA).

The resolution, approved by a 5-0 vote, directs the city to use the plan as a framework for future zoning, infrastructure investments and partnerships with UCO and private developers to revitalize the area between UCO and downtown Edmond.

City officials and consultants said the plan seeks to create a walkable, mixed‑use neighborhood that better connects downtown to the UCO campus. “The intent of the plan is to focus on revitalizing the area between UCO and downtown and creating a vibrant, connected, walkable, mixed‑use neighborhood,” AJ Kirkpatrick, the city’s director of planning, told the council during the presentation.

The plan draws on a market analysis and public outreach, including a December charrette and separate surveys of students, faculty and nearby residents. Consultants reported potential demand that could support new housing, roughly 95,000 square feet of retail over the next eight years, and interest in a small boutique hotel, contingent on market timing.

Consultants outlined near‑term “proof‑of‑market” projects on six identified blocks. Those projects emphasize low‑rise, street‑front retail and restaurants with limited upper‑floor office or residential uses to show viability before larger mixed‑use developments are pursued. A conceptual package also recommends two potential parking‑garage sites and reserved areas for a future hotel and civic uses.

The plan includes a three‑category land‑use framework: a lower‑density residential area north of Ayers, a mixed‑use core south of Ayers with active ground‑floor uses on University Drive, Main Street and Campbell Street, and transitional infill areas. The consultants stressed the plan is guidance for potential zoning work rather than an immediate rezoning.

Nate Claire, one of the consultants, described mobility and public‑realm priorities that accompany the land‑use recommendations: enhanced crosswalks, generous sidewalks, protected bike lanes and the potential to test a roundabout or raised intersection at the University/Ayers gateway to create an identifiable entry to the district.

University leadership voiced support. “The university is in full support. We think the time has come,” President Lam said during remarks to council members, thanking city leaders for the collaboration.

Council members commended the study’s scope and the city‑university collaboration. Several asked that the city and UCO keep nearby residents informed as the plan advances from study to zoning, site planning and capital improvements. Council members and the consultants noted that financing and market feasibility remain constraints: the plan identifies likely public‑private financing tools such as TIF and encourages the EEDA and the city to pursue creative gap funding and development partnerships.

The council voted 5-0 to adopt the plan as presented. Adoption sets the city’s policy direction; any future zoning changes, plats or site plans will require separate approvals and additional public outreach.

Proponents said the plan could leverage existing public investments nearby — including the new City Hall and a downtown parking garage — and better capture retail spending from students and visitors. The resolution does not appropriate funds for specific projects; it authorizes the city to incorporate the plan’s recommendations into future planning and capital programming.

The city manager and planning staff said next steps will include outreach to property owners, follow‑up zoning work if needed, a request for information (RFI) process to seek development partners, more detailed parking analysis and staging of capital improvements.","The Edmond City Council unanimously approved a University District plan developed with the University of Central Oklahoma and the Edmond Economic Development Authority, endorsing mixed‑use development, improved pedestrian connections and targeted infrastructure upgrades.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Edmond City Council meeting — actions and outcomes

Council approves FY25 funding to Edmond EDA and encumbers lease funds; lease termination postponed

Council approves controversial plan amendment at Covell and Bryant after residents voice safety, tree and character concerns

Edmond council adopts University District plan to guide redevelopment between UCO and downtown