[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6496974,"mediaKeyId","5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b","parentId",5545691,"title","Residents urge Dallas City Council and police to end cooperation with ICE, demand immediate family notification and safeguards","audioSeconds",1959,"startMs",2627000,"endMs",4586000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b&start=2627&end=4586","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b/thumbnail_2627000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6496974/Dallas/Dallas-County/Texas/Residents-urge-Dallas-City-Council-and-police-to-end-cooperation-with-ICE-demand-immediate-family-notification-and-safeguards","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6496974-4b7d558c9771a3e1fab869b32be7f6c1/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404418&Signature=kYlUXaK~L73j0MtszS32fT7sJ92hSNQT9kMBwCURGkWprilu-186p1QlvARQHS0oDnflbEOsg8RvGgszMd~4CvNhrQwQLonL99KsZikIGxZqag0Xv6iN8N7h49GTmyGgPnIWZC9Aa9H4s3uDoefvhcW25srHxvLY4aOr3mWZk-QhFfMDn8OXnVzMTg57IBJFtasyasMpLO17DfdPotky5FwAa4wXKS1GuRqTz8xqR4U5w1vPVemp49PMmgfWTt89F5fKi7sYX-gdmHSOyPl~Exuj0tgeed1LMfPUB8RK4koKpfe0pj4oqC-iTV51Y60qHCTfrWaoFXFbMmh-u2W24Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Dallas","date","2025-08-06T00:00:00Z","article","Dozens of residents and community leaders used the city’s public‑comment period Aug. 6 to repeatedly press the Dallas City Council and Dallas Police Department (DPD) for immediate action and transparency regarding collaboration with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Several speakers alleged that people had been detained without timely family notification, denounced reported conditions at a local ICE field office and sought a public commitment that DPD will not honor voluntary ICE detainer requests or share non‑public information with federal immigration authorities except where legally required.

Notable public testimony: Azo Alvarez, representing community advocates, said \"Immigrants in Dallas are being disappeared\" and urged immediate family notification when someone is detained. Megan Chanley of District 7 urged the council to demand public clarification of DPD’s policy and said, \"If Dallas is going to collaborate with ICE...we need immediate family notification.\" Karen Muncy, a lifelong Dallas resident, asked the council to \"refuse to collaborate in any way with U.S. immigration and customs enforcement in our city.\" Multiple speakers asked that ICE agents identify themselves when making arrests and not to obscure their faces.

Council action to hear more speakers: earlier in the meeting a council member moved to suspend the rules and allow the council to hear a larger group of registered Dallas speakers. The motion passed 12 in favor, 1 opposed, 2 absent. After the suspension passed, council members heard extended public comment from immigrants’ rights advocates, faith leaders and other residents.

What residents demanded: common requests included immediate family notification when someone is detained, a public statement from the DPD chief and County Sheriff about local practices, a written commitment that DPD will not honor voluntary ICE detainers, prohibition on sharing non‑public DPD data (such as traffic or citation databases) with ICE unless legally required, and measures to prevent ICE from operating covertly (distinct uniforms, visible identification and banning face coverings during arrests).

City response and next steps requested by residents: speakers asked for an agenda item directing DPD to define permissible cooperation with ICE and to require judicial warrants for detentions; they also requested public audits of any data sharing and more robust public reporting of DPD interactions that involve federal immigration authorities. Several callers pressed for an investigation of reported conditions at an ICE field office and asked the city’s code‑compliance and oversight functions to review whether facilities are being used for prolonged detention.

Why it matters: speakers said the perceived cooperation is harming trust between immigrant communities and local police and discouraging crime reporting and public‑safety cooperation. Public commenters included volunteer advocates, immigrants, clergy and civil‑liberties groups; the council temporarily adjusted its procedures on the morning of Aug. 6 to hear an expanded roster of speakers.

Ending note: councilmembers took no formal policy vote on ICE cooperation during the Aug. 6 meeting; the public pressure and suspension to hear additional speakers indicate the issue has significant community salience and may prompt future council action or requests for formal DPD statements.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Dallas - Council Briefing","oneSentenceSummary","Dozens of residents, faith leaders and advocates urged Dallas officials Aug. 6 to end or sharply limit DPD cooperation with ICE, demand immediate family notification for detentions and require ICE agents to identify themselves.","taxTitle","Dallas, Dallas County, Texas","taxId",2781,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6496978,"Dallas staff propose moving postponement requests to public hearings to increase transparency; council debates costs and timing",618,1548000,2166000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b&start=1548&end=2166","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b/thumbnail_1548000.jpg","/articles/6496978/Dallas/Dallas-County/Texas/Dallas-staff-propose-moving-postponement-requests-to-public-hearings-to-increase-transparency-council-debates-costs-and-timing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6496978-b1b78f30a341e80d298cb39143a23425/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404418&Signature=bn~U2XZAxt1qRxfrYPwWE-cK9VoptRPyLphuN~UHZxQShUsKGrFMncctCIJZeHwkmV4FYoIKr5nPBZoW9GtEOobQ14NZHh-79ag90QLRj5I4h7KzRbOLD4Yk8D1RVdmIqqU6VILCBWcHEo9sYC7mhnbGlpitrSv2-Z~XsB-JWuI3vD2C4k3nXOfB5FCAl58TtEwj2ljFoQeuh~gHwpM-vZTdtbNqsOX5AsX0Sg47ZXOIFLasWWWgGujnlwJajLBjD23ODv4VdDr3Y7KfVX6cZ9lekL6q6QRd1DddLYVvrref5FAi0pAsgMEuVW8rJxkSNrbR0nOpW66RCJEX-PL37g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City planning staff briefed the Dallas City Council Aug. 6 on a proposed development‑code amendment that would shift paid postponement requests for zoning cases from an automatic administrative action to a public hearing discussion before the City Plan Commission (CPC) or City Council.

The staff‑initiated proposal would continue to allow postponements but would require the reason for a postponement to be aired at the public hearing—what staff described as a daylighting of rationale so commissioners and the public can see why a case is delayed. Andrea Gillis, deputy director for zoning, told the council the current code allows an applicant or a property owner in the notice area to submit a $150 form before a hearing that automatically removes a noticed item from the agenda and triggers a re‑notice, duplicative staff work and additional advertisement costs.

Staff presented five years of data showing the city processed about 1,400 zoning cases during that period and that postponements tied to applicants or opponents were a small share (roughly two dozen cases over five years). Gillis said re‑noticing after an administrative postponement can cost the city several hundred to a few thousand dollars depending on the number of addresses and the newspaper ad length; staff estimated the labor burden spans multiple employees and several hours for larger mailings.

City staff also described authorized hearings—city‑initiated, broad area rezoning reviews—as more time‑consuming and costly to re‑notice because they can include thousands of properties and many community meetings before coming to CPC. Staff proposed alternatives, including a petition threshold (a percent of affected property owners) submitted in advance to automatically trigger postponement at the hearing or codifying a date‑certain postponement to avoid immediate re‑notice.

Council debate: Councilmembers were split. Supporters said the change increases transparency—requests and reasons would be publicly visible and the bodies deciding cases could direct the next steps such as additional meetings. Critics said current practice gives predictable notice to residents (they receive a letter that the case will not be heard) and worried new rules could burden small residents who lack time to collect signatures or attend hearings. Several members pressed staff to calculate full cost recovery (including staff time) and to show how notification improvements could better reach residents (clearer envelopes, digital tools, improved mailing vendor capacity).

Staff said the code dates to the 1980s and the $150 fee had not been updated since the 1990s; staff agreed to return with precise full‑cost calculations, proposed thresholds, and draft code language when the item is returned as a formal ordinance.

Next steps: staff recommended returning the amendment for formal consideration on Aug. 13 (per prior direction) and said they will provide cost‑recovery numbers and alternatives such as advance petition thresholds while working with council members and CPC. Council discussion continued into questions and clarifications; no ordinance vote was taken Aug. 6.","City planning staff presented a proposed code amendment to require requests to postpone zoning items be made and decided at public hearings instead of by staff after a paid administrative filing. Councilmembers debated predictability, cost recovery, and potential impacts on residents and applicants.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6496982,"Dallas council adopts HUD consolidated-plan budget as city pauses equity tools to comply with federal directives",27,525000,552000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b&start=525&end=552","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b/thumbnail_525000.jpg","/articles/6496982/Dallas/Dallas-County/Texas/Dallas-council-adopts-HUD-consolidated-plan-budget-as-city-pauses-equity-tools-to-comply-with-federal-directives","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6496982-1b599e62df5085ccd6ca6d203ad1399a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404418&Signature=MGhWgTJnCYTTvXVbcAc-NHVrp92mztlfKDL7nYIOCXgNIsuBi1bAL74~UV4r1-NgGCuwyaspJcO8-V4lgZdKRfHnkYKdg-mCnyVYC456zj00Dd0Gw5ZZZSQrnfatO3K3ddNOvOGOy4s2e283slE4efk7K2u6asm~hky5hOtBNdq7HPGk8K1TpGX7HeipA-0~soADVGjAVhZqGb88p0Ronk6kBKR2YdRO81Hu93nt4xTGz-Q7rtFzoJPq4SgjJBbNc~negUPAQlaNsQo1QYs5i4YEJhw4YSlFCa5iorkEC5Vc7xpLR3i1wZvZ7ShTqUo3Y0zo0uzRnrKomCNmRhs4~Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Dallas City Council adopted a fiscal 2025–26 HUD consolidated-plan budget estimated at $29,886,873 on Aug. 6 after a brief public‑hearing closing motion and a unanimous approval to move the item forward. Councilmember Paula Blackman moved to close the May 28 public hearing and approve the budget, which the council adopted as presented.

City staff said the vote clears submission of the city’s HUD budget to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) so federal funds can be secured. Assistant city manager Liz Cedillo Perera told the council a cross‑department “grant compliance task force” reviewed recent presidential executive orders and revised federal grant guidance and advised pausing some policies that pose legal risk to federal funding.

The adopted HUD consolidated-plan budget includes estimated allocations of $12,944,689 for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG); $5,082,901 for HOME Investment Partnerships; $1,144,567 for Emergency Solutions Grant; $10,014,716 for Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA); and $700,000 estimated CDBG and HOME program income.

Why it matters: the city manager’s office said the pause is intended to avoid jeopardizing federal funds while staff and the city attorney complete legal reviews. Staff described the action as temporary: departments will continue reviews, stakeholder engagement and return to council in September with recommended policy changes and a proposed implementation plan slated to begin Oct. 1.

What was paused and why: staff listed several city tools that were temporarily suspended to reduce compliance risk, including the Business Inclusion and Development (BID) policy’s MWBE numeric subcontracting goals, the city’s Racial Equity Plan (adopted in 2022) and the Equity Impact Assessment Tool. The city said it will replace numeric MWBE goals with a proposed “Dallas Capacity Building Collaborative” that emphasizes good‑faith efforts, training and geographically and size‑based metrics for small and local business participation.

Officials said the change aims to preserve community impact while aligning procurement and grant practices with federal directives that bar certain selection or funding criteria that the federal government says may discriminate on the basis of race, gender, national origin or religion. Liz Cedillo Perera said the city has retained external procurement consultants and will engage certification agencies, chambers of commerce and community partners while staff develop a more detailed program for council consideration.

Timing and next steps: staff said they will submit the HUD budget this month to secure FY2025–26 funds, then return Aug. 27 with a preliminary amendment to the city’s five‑year HUD plan and hold a 30‑day public comment period before seeking final adoption Oct. 8. Staff recommended returning to council Sept. 24 with policy recommendations for formal adoption.

Council questions and concerns: council members raised several concerns during the briefing, including the scope and speed of the staff review, how the new local/size‑based procurement criteria will be defined (geography, employee residence, headquarters location), the potential budget and staffing impacts of the changes, and the degree of community engagement used to shape the proposal. Staff said some stakeholder outreach has occurred (vendor/certification groups and civic partners) and promised broader community meetings before formal policy adoption.

What staff said about legal risk: Willow Sanchez, assistant city attorney, advised the council that some existing program descriptions and selection criteria in city planning documents could conflict with the federal guidance. Sanchez described a distinction between collecting demographic data for planning and making funding allocations explicitly based on protected classes; staff said the review will identify necessary edits and legally resilient alternatives.

Ending note: city staff framed the work as a pivot to preserve federal funding while sustaining the city’s community goals. The council adopted the HUD consolidated-plan budget on the Aug. 6 consent action and directed staff to return with a fuller set of recommendations and a community engagement plan ahead of formal policy changes this fall.","The Dallas City Council approved a $29.9 million HUD consolidated-plan budget for FY2025–26 while city staff said several equity- and race‑conscious policies were temporarily paused as part of a cross‑department legal review to comply with recent federal executive orders and revised grant rules.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6496971,"Votes at a glance: Dallas City Council actions, Aug. 6, 2025",531,1220000,1751000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b&start=1220&end=1751","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5545691-cb72fafdd232a18d78c5b265c10e990b/thumbnail_1220000.jpg","/articles/6496971/Dallas/Dallas-County/Texas/Votes-at-a-glance-Dallas-City-Council-actions-Aug-6-2025","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6496971-80da20951db1ca1403c41f26a0e03e85/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404418&Signature=JjY9Cq84L9Ax1ORK0VZBDB08~ctdmQJ4Q~iV01~ssmapbn3ZUoTJF9cjNzYhrq99SGAa2Rk8QH8EaVEVeyYOMOumwSrgzbYyzNFPM15gLqO8I9VFaK1c8gJQWODCQ5eYoX5NU0cyK0Ydekbw1A0o1uVdL9SDcT40A6-miIxDHUNJdtM~qBrm71v5A8P9cINi8ldHyBF8xXd-k4z65MM7dMYAJ72tqDkUik1GF6OQVGh~8gBuM4VtkSCgvXCo5cUeVNwJDq~CbwTLxZPVguvKEqZS3p4w0f18KOzkSeIzarS~Od3jX5b0Bv-D2Nz~2XM-y2PtPnNbLxfkGpor6d~rBQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Dallas City Council took several formal actions Aug. 6. This roundup lists the key recorded votes and short descriptions of each outcome.

Approval of minutes: Council approved minutes for multiple special and regular meetings (June 9, June 10, June 16 [9:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m.], June 18). No roll‑call tally was recorded in the transcript excerpts beyond the city secretary noting the motion and saying \"Ayes have it.\"

Appointments to boards and commissions: Council approved several individual appointments to boards and commissions including Rachel Hayden (Board of Adjustment nominee by Councilmember Blackman), Elisha L. Lewis (Community Development Commission, Councilmember Gracie), Anne C. Faye (Ethics Advisory Commission, Councilmember West), Robin Kirk (Municipal Library Board, Councilmember Basil Dua), Andrew D. Nash II (Youth Commission, Councilmember Gracie), and Michael Dorn (Board of Adjustment alternate member, Councilmember West). Council approved the nominations by voice vote; the city secretary announced \"Ayes have it.\"

HUD consolidated-plan budget (Agenda item 3): Council voted to close the May 28 public hearing and adopt the FY2025–26 HUD consolidated‑plan budget, estimated at $29,886,873, including allocations for CDBG, HOME, ESG and HOPWA. Councilmember Paula Blackman moved to close the public hearing and approve the item; the motion passed (announcement: \"Ayes have it\").

Suspension of rules for expanded public comment: On a motion to suspend the rules and allow an expanded group of registered Dallas speakers to be heard, the council recorded a roll call result of 12 in favor, 1 opposed and 2 absent; the motion passed. This suspension allowed a larger docket of public speakers to address the council during the open‑microphone period.

Notes: The transcript recorded these votes as part of routine agenda business and public comment management. Several briefing items were presented after these actions; no additional formal ordinance adoptions occurred during the Aug. 6 session reported here.","A short roundup of formal votes recorded at the Aug. 6 Dallas City Council meeting: approval of minutes, appointments, HUD consolidated‑plan adoption, and a suspension of rules to hear additional public speakers.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Residents urge Dallas City Council and police to end cooperation with ICE, demand immediate family notification and safeguards

Dallas staff propose moving postponement requests to public hearings to increase transparency; council debates costs and timing

Dallas council adopts HUD consolidated-plan budget as city pauses equity tools to comply with federal directives

Votes at a glance: Dallas City Council actions, Aug. 6, 2025