MaineHealth Behavioral Health Defends Services Termination Amid Disability Discrimination Claims

July 30, 2025 | Human Rights Commission, Maine, Executive, Maine


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

MaineHealth Behavioral Health Defends Services Termination Amid Disability Discrimination Claims
The Maine Human Rights Commission convened on July 30, 2025, to address a significant case involving allegations of discrimination based on disability. The case centered around Christopher McGonigal, who claimed that MaineHealth Behavioral Health unlawfully terminated his residential mental health treatment services at Crescent Place due to his behavioral health condition.

During the meeting, attorney Emily Mott, representing McGonigal, argued that his mental health condition qualifies as a disability under the law, regardless of its severity. She questioned whether certain behaviors exhibited by McGonigal, such as fantasizing about an employee and closing car doors, could be classified as disability-related. Mott emphasized the need for reasonable accommodations under fair housing laws, asserting that McGonigal's rights were not adequately considered when he was barred from the facility.

In response, attorney Laura Reiter, representing MaineHealth, maintained that the organization acted appropriately in terminating services due to McGonigal's behavior, which posed a direct threat to staff. Reiter highlighted that the decision was not discriminatory, as it was based on safety concerns rather than McGonigal's disability. She noted that the protection from harassment order against McGonigal was a critical factor in the decision-making process.

The commission discussed the implications of medication compliance and the importance of evaluating whether McGonigal's behavior constituted a direct threat. Reiter pointed out that McGonigal had been placed in another facility, ensuring he continued to receive necessary services.

After deliberation, the commission ultimately found no reasonable grounds to believe that MaineHealth discriminated against McGonigal based on his disability. The decision underscored the balance between ensuring safety in treatment facilities and upholding the rights of individuals with disabilities.

The commission's ruling will be communicated to the involved parties, marking a significant moment in the ongoing dialogue about disability rights and mental health treatment in Maine.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maine articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI