A contentious debate over a recent appointment to the Economic Development Commission dominated the Vermillion County Commissioners Meeting on January 2, 2025. The discussion centered on whether a December appointment was valid, given that the term of the previous officeholder does not officially end until January 31.

Commissioner Tim Dunham raised concerns about the legitimacy of the appointment, questioning if it was made in accordance with state statutes. He argued that the appointment should not have occurred before the term's expiration, suggesting that the previous administration acted prematurely. Dunham emphasized that the law stipulates a 10-day window for the newly appointed member to assume office, which he claimed was not honored.

Ron Dunland, the current president of the Economic Development Commission, defended the appointment, asserting that it was made according to state law and that the previous board's actions were valid. He insisted that the law clearly states his term continues until January 31, and any appointment made before that date is not legitimate.

The discussion escalated as Dunham and Dunland exchanged views on the interpretation of the law, with Dunham suggesting that the board could vote to vacate the appointment if deemed incorrect. Legal counsel was referenced, indicating that if the board decided to undo the appointment, the appointee could seek judicial review.

Ultimately, the commissioners agreed to notify the appointee that the board found the appointment to be improperly executed and that the position would be open for reappointment on February 1. This decision underscores the ongoing complexities of governance and adherence to legal protocols within Vermillion County. The board's next steps will be crucial as they navigate the implications of this decision and prepare for the upcoming reappointment process.