The Scott County Fiscal Court convened on July 24, 2025, to discuss various community concerns, primarily focusing on the regulation of utility task vehicles (UTVs) on county roadways. The meeting highlighted differing opinions among court members and constituents regarding the safety and practicality of allowing UTVs on public roads.

The discussion began with inquiries about the legal framework governing UTVs, particularly their operation on U.S. Highway 25. Sheriff Nettles clarified that while UTVs are prohibited on interstates and certain controlled access highways, they are permitted on U.S. 25, provided they adhere to specific regulations, including speed limits. The speed limit on U.S. 25 is generally 55 miles per hour, which raised concerns among some members about the safety of UTVs operating at such speeds.

Several court members expressed their constituents' apprehensions regarding UTVs, citing safety concerns and potential nuisances in residential areas. One member noted that feedback from constituents has been predominantly negative, with many residents worried about the vehicles' handling and their ability to navigate safely alongside standard vehicles. This sentiment was echoed by others who shared similar experiences of receiving negative feedback from their communities.

The conversation shifted to the role of homeowners' associations (HOAs) in regulating UTV access in neighborhoods. It was clarified that while HOAs cannot supersede county regulations, the court could consider exempting certain neighborhoods from UTV operation if deemed necessary.

Ryan Pratt, a court member, emphasized that the original intent of the legislation allowing UTVs was to promote tourism rather than facilitate everyday transportation. He noted that Scott County lacks the necessary trails for UTV tourism, which further complicates the rationale for allowing these vehicles on public roads.

Public comments were invited, with attendees expressing a mix of support and opposition. Some highlighted misconceptions about UTVs, clarifying that they differ significantly from ATVs and motorcycles in terms of safety features and design. Others reiterated concerns about the potential impact on community safety and quality of life.

The court concluded the meeting by acknowledging the need for further discussion and feedback before drafting any ordinance to regulate UTVs. It was suggested that the court seek input from similar suburban counties to inform their decision-making process. The court remains open to considering an ordinance in the future, contingent upon community feedback and further deliberation.