[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6589798,"mediaKeyId","5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411","parentId",5474835,"title","Commission weighs safety‑focused limits for political signs and digital signage while staff researches legal constraints","audioSeconds",662,"startMs",4288000,"endMs",4950000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411&start=4288&end=4950","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411/thumbnail_4288000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6589798/Parker/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-weighs-safetyfocused-limits-for-political-signs-and-digital-signage-while-staff-researches-legal-constraints","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6589798-954c1804f5378b00dbfa9baffede65a3/orig.mp4?Expires=1770997289&Signature=Oyc4XQeOhk2WMlf-LLhoAAabs4a8a9WDtFwrDsf7IRSOR935KpsUINY~uGMLnc-o~kbO81d5295dE9sFp2ObNTrddjxGn9RtHYYMmqDWncu9rNJ7FgSZ1KIGkP0kp00E7fO81tv6ZLfZx6iYi80WMk4~FpEcG2G~N0FhkkUpfvCg0BKZw3i6OGv7-XdpXX82UPBSV48XhjKZw67sljfgqMZFPxTP5cmcTcyOZ86hhYMUlke42CPPVTOzHNyWjMPlymdu5dHaoFPJcmIti3abjrME4~R20trIHxM-Y8zjM14Xv4KHjoQQL9Ah9kQHTOBhyAvSwEz90lAsFLTDCjTGXA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Parker","date","2025-07-24T00:00:00Z","article","Commissioners discussed a referral to review Chapter 153 of the city code on signs. The conversation covered three distinct issues: temporary political signs (especially around City Hall during elections), static sign size and setbacks, and the regulation of LED or digital message signs.

For temporary political signage, commissioners proposed safety‑based location limits (examples discussed included a 10‑foot setback from the roadway edge at City Hall and limited areas where signs may be placed) rather than a broad numeric prohibition. One commissioner suggested limiting the number of signs in the City Hall area to make enforcement manageable, noting enforcement resources are limited and crews sometimes remove and re‑post signs as they respond to complaints.

On digital and LED signage, commissioners raised concerns about brightness and message motion. Attendees suggested researching measurable brightness limits, limits on scrolling or rapidly changing text, and rules that prevent signs from producing distracting, flashing displays (police and fire lights were referenced as an example of potentially blinding lighting). Discussion included a reference to an existing large “keyhole” sign form and questions about maximum permitted heights and setbacks in current code.

Commissioners emphasized that any restriction must be legally defensible with regard to First Amendment limits on political speech. The group asked staff to compare approaches other cities use, verify what is legally permissible, and return recommendations that prioritize safety, enforceability and constitutional constraints. No ordinance amendments were adopted at the meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Parker - Planning & Zoning","oneSentenceSummary","The planning commission reviewed a referral on Chapter 153 (signs), discussed safety‑based setbacks for election signs at City Hall, possible numeric limits, and technical limits for LED/digital signage; staff will research legal constraints and measurable brightness standards.","taxTitle","Parker, Collin County, Texas","taxId",69443,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6589803,"Commission discusses adding commercial retail provisions and use of Planned Development (PD) option",365,3428000,3793000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411&start=3428&end=3793","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411/thumbnail_3428000.jpg","/articles/6589803/Parker/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-discusses-adding-commercial-retail-provisions-and-use-of-Planned-Development-PD-option","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6589803-e1328022d03fbcd42e2c189fb818c03d/orig.mp4?Expires=1770997289&Signature=dbsDAEKlNms89FSHvO4Ibt4xRAm~ceCkgw9nbG70~QGM1uknb1w5zwtvsJQbgeuXAS5mGJKnsORQTGpi~xpSYdimvEsbozM-dpw7E2AuZ5610WIBowWw-V3RHjKJinimck7cTGk69IMkRLYz5iFEZwn6f9xsdAt8ex9fpVkhfMBQdjtH0AP4AJF-crtVWj87L4n6GCJwF-4viqEmabZ7urCNFTndHGyaqQL6o0Sb6pCdBXm-0Eo3DcwtaXjC9k2jQI9zUB5~-HVH79JXB5yAgvEeIhhTuv0xr1uTCw8gTcXD6kz--NsJFsd~kGv1CTzY-4utyw-7rdFQSXEl4jIYog__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The commission considered a referral asking planning staff to research and draft potential additions to the zoning code for commercial retail uses. Commissioners discussed using a Plan Development (PD) district as the primary tool to permit non‑residential uses in targeted areas rather than broad base rezoning.

Discussion centered on where retail might be appropriate if the commission and council permit it. Commissioners identified candidate corridors and nodes — for example, the corridor near Lucas Road and the King’s Crossing area and commercial‑oriented corners along major arterials such as the Betsy/Murphy intersection — as locations that could be evaluated for PDs. Several attendees noted most of the city is currently zoned single‑family residential, so any commercial use would come through a PD or developer proposal that includes public notice and an approval process.

Commissioners described the PD process as flexible: a developer submits a concept plan and proposed ordinance text; the planning commission and staff review and make recommendations, including conditions, buffers and design standards. Commissioners emphasized neighborhood notice and opportunities for public comment as part of the PD process and said staff will identify specific geographic areas where the commission would be willing to consider PD applications.

The commission did not create a new zoning category at the meeting. Staff was asked to research likely candidate areas, summarize potential impacts, and return recommended language and a public‑outreach plan for commission review.","The planning commission reviewed a council referral about drafting commercial retail zoning provisions, discussed Plan Development (PD) district procedures, and suggested likely corridors for any future commercial zoning.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6589805,"Commission to rework South Fork Special Activities District rules after council referral",1262,2210000,3472000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411&start=2210&end=3472","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411/thumbnail_2210000.jpg","/articles/6589805/Parker/Collin-County/Texas/Commission-to-rework-South-Fork-Special-Activities-District-rules-after-council-referral","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6589805-ae70fdf2b68848a61a9be77029cd2d64/orig.mp4?Expires=1770997289&Signature=V~e2vBNIN3QCfBhDhGk6af2YXCbTYWJZrFwMu9J~2pSP19J0ScH-Vu89wF0rRlDoRxnrE3TvIFTkVgDCzD6jcGQr8AOQi4jNWgTLjo9M8rWP8Fr-oK2ioRv5ZgqlAVVLTPsfkU1UZdgZlDFiUTaXguIQxMSFNLJwWZGqTlTP-NjgkhAPpVMlZDQrsf4lqHpy9duseUgtOpRkCzezqLy4h6pLN7UtkrMqrnBYWedkWenKRV79fLRvRI3dN~xtHA6P1BiXiTKY9KLb1eJSBNoZNEHR67weh5TWDI9LzkAO-9HYbU1TpdBr4Z30C4DAiGpbTuyjV6VClyasCtv0nJnP7Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The commission discussed a city council referral asking planning and zoning to review the South Fork Special Activities District ordinance. Commissioners said recent changes in the tract’s configuration mean the district’s remaining acreage may no longer meet the size and open‑space thresholds in existing code.

Attendees described a reduced tract footprint (an example cited: an original 75‑acre concept reduced to roughly 37 acres in the area under review) and pointed to specific code requirements that could be affected — including a cited 40 percent open‑space requirement and minimum area thresholds for certain Special Activities District uses. Commissioners noted a related parcel total cited during the discussion (151.316 acres on the east side of Colebrook) when clarifying what land remains designated for residential versus activities uses.

The commission raised practical questions for the referral: whether the remaining Special Activities area still qualifies for the same mix of allowed commercial and event uses (hotels, conference facilities, restaurants, golf and recreation) and whether a revised district should be re‑platted or re‑zoned. Several commissioners suggested working with the developer and city council to confirm the concept plan, reexamine buffers and setbacks between proposed housing and activity areas, and ensure permitted uses remain appropriate given the smaller remaining area.

Commissioners agreed to schedule a dedicated follow‑up meeting to take a deeper look, assemble engineering and platting materials, and develop recommended text revisions or rezoning steps to return to the city council. No zoning changes were adopted at the meeting.

The planning staff was asked to assemble the relevant plats, compute current district acreage versus code minimums and prepare a recommendation on whether the district ordinance needs to be reapplied, amended, or repealed and replaced.","The planning commission reviewed a city council referral on the South Fork Special Activities District, identified acreage and compliance questions and scheduled further work to produce recommendations back to council.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6589809,"Planning commissioners agree to draft consolidated fireworks, noise and open‑burning rules",1597,633000,2230000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411&start=633&end=2230","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5474835-f142b882312224f359f5776032ebd411/thumbnail_633000.jpg","/articles/6589809/Parker/Collin-County/Texas/Planning-commissioners-agree-to-draft-consolidated-fireworks-noise-and-openburning-rules","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6589809-a80dd3714b6c626335309447188b6428/orig.mp4?Expires=1770997289&Signature=cFZl~o-oAkqCgXPmCcJc9ZnDAVIb5xpTjZRBimJlsr3C4PlwdTgh1kl12xiuEfhJHrnLiVrtbmksH7raTKxEYpg6MeXmxaNxmqQNZVQwpdAqx7tPGIIKe9B~~HRrpHpKx3n1h5sP4rpPCfLb2wB2zVQV85-ZG88zHaeWZ1NbBdsXLh5X~D0g7WdX6uV6rd8or1QZqBN9zkAOzYW51cLBGWRVOJwBNXcOAvk9h3xJgPjq9jCYwqo6bxDhrrcG5pM~ZOIuTfUlVDhyqvFKf3cBNoD3iHO3zBtmfofFynxKMO~KHuMnbuPPVJcsXD5kY8kmEM9xmng8yy-88Q-C84RcNA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Planning commissioners spent part of their meeting reviewing decades‑old provisions that address fireworks, noise and open burning and agreed to prepare a consolidated, updated ordinance for future consideration.

Commissioners said Parker has several existing rules dating to the 1970s and 1980s that can conflict or are unclear in application. They noted an existing limit in the South Fork Special Activities District on large, permitted fireworks events (commonly framed as 12 events per year) and contrasted that with questions about regulation of individual private fireworks and short, high‑impact displays.

The discussion focused on three practical problems: (1) overlapping provisions written at different times that yield inconsistent requirements, (2) distinguishing transient celebratory noise from ongoing nuisance noise, and (3) ensuring public‑safety controls (permits, minimum distances from structures and on‑site fire protection) are enforceable. Commissioners referenced language in older ordinances that allows some fireworks when a required separation from structures is maintained (a 250‑foot separation was cited in the conversation) and discussed a separate numeric size threshold used elsewhere in the draft (a proposed 3‑foot dimension was mentioned for a “small” category).

Commissioners and staff flagged enforcement burdens as a key concern. They said patchwork provisions increase administrative work and can create confusion for residents and event organizers; staff noted examples of private backyard use, sparklers and commercial shows that operate under different rules. The group emphasized framing any new rule primarily around safety (permit requirements, required on‑site fire suppression and minimum separation distances) rather than attempting broad bans on brief celebratory noise.

The commission assigned a small group of commissioners and staff to prepare a consolidated ordinance draft and recommended that the draft repeal or cross‑reference older, superseded provisions so the code is internally consistent. The commission did not adopt any ordinance at the meeting and left timing for the follow‑up draft unspecified.

The matter will return to the commission as a drafted ordinance for additional review, with staff asked to identify enforceable safety standards and to note where local rules intersect with county or state fire prevention requirements.","Commissioners discussed multiple overlapping ordinances on fireworks, noise and open burning, flagged public‑safety and enforcement concerns, and asked staff and commissioners to prepare a single, updated draft for future review.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission weighs safety‑focused limits for political signs and digital signage while staff researches legal constraints

Commission discusses adding commercial retail provisions and use of Planned Development (PD) option

Commission to rework South Fork Special Activities District rules after council referral

Planning commissioners agree to draft consolidated fireworks, noise and open‑burning rules