The Judicial Council of California reaffirmed its stance on the classification of app-based drivers during its meeting on July 18, 2025, emphasizing the continued validity of Proposition 22. This law, passed by voters in November, establishes that app-based drivers for companies like Uber and DoorDash are independent contractors rather than employees.

The Council addressed a recent request from a plaintiff's lawyer seeking to amend jury instructions related to this classification. The lawyer argued that Proposition 22 only pertains to wage and hour laws, suggesting that its implications should not extend to other legal contexts. However, the Council and representatives from Uber firmly rejected this notion, asserting that the law's language explicitly states it applies "notwithstanding any other provision of law."

Scott Jalowick, a director from Uber's legal team, highlighted the importance of maintaining the current jury instructions, which correctly reflect the law as it stands. He noted that the California Court of Appeal had previously upheld the broader applicability of Proposition 22, confirming that it encompasses various legal contexts, including vicarious liability.

The Council's decision to retain the existing jury instructions underscores its commitment to upholding the legal framework established by Proposition 22, ensuring that app-based drivers maintain their independent contractor status. This resolution is expected to have significant implications for the gig economy in California, reinforcing the protections that voters intended for drivers who rely on these platforms for their livelihoods.

As the Council moves forward, it remains focused on ensuring that any changes to legal instructions are driven by actual changes in the law, rather than unfounded proposals. This meeting marks a critical step in clarifying the legal landscape for app-based drivers and the companies that employ them.