In a recent session of the California State Senate, lawmakers engaged in significant discussions surrounding federal funding and its implications for the state. The meeting, held on July 17, 2025, focused on several key legislative items, including resolutions aimed at reinforcing California's commitment to federal investments.

One of the standout discussions was led by Senator Cortese, who presented Senate Joint Resolution 6 (SJR 6). This resolution urges President Trump and Congress to maintain the funding made possible by three pivotal federal laws: the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the Chips and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act. Senator Cortese emphasized the substantial benefits these laws have brought to California, highlighting over $63 billion awarded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law alone. This funding has been crucial for various projects, including clean hydrogen production and high-speed rail construction.

Cortese also pointed out the economic impact of these investments, noting that in the early months of 2025, over 42,000 jobs were lost nationwide due to policy reversals related to these laws, with more than 1,300 of those jobs in California. The resolution aims to reaffirm California's support for these federal initiatives, which are vital for infrastructure, clean energy, and economic development.

The Senate voted on SJR 6, resulting in a strong majority in favor, with 26 votes for and 6 against, signaling a unified stance among many lawmakers on the importance of these federal investments.

Following this, Senator Cervantes introduced Senate Joint Resolution 7, which addresses tariffs, although details on this resolution were not elaborated during the session. The discussions reflect a broader commitment among California lawmakers to advocate for federal support that directly benefits the state's economy and infrastructure.

As the session progressed, the Senate demonstrated its focus on leveraging federal resources to bolster California's growth and resilience, particularly in light of recent job losses and economic challenges. The outcomes of these resolutions will likely influence future funding and policy decisions, underscoring the ongoing dialogue between state and federal governments regarding critical investments.