Congress Questions America's First Fund and Diplomacy Strategy in Hearing

In a recent meeting of the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, significant concerns were raised regarding the management and resources of the State Department for Fiscal Year 2026. The discussions highlighted the potential risks to American diplomacy and global leadership amid proposed budget cuts and the controversial America First Opportunities Fund.

The meeting opened with pointed remarks from committee members about the implications of reducing funding for programs that have historically advanced U.S. interests and safeguarded American lives. One member criticized the proposed budget cuts as detrimental to the integrity of American diplomacy, questioning the true meaning of the "America First" policy. This sentiment reflects a growing unease among lawmakers about the direction of U.S. foreign policy and its impact on international relations.

A focal point of the discussion was the America First Opportunities Fund, which has been described as a "slush fund" by critics. This fund, proposed by Secretary Rubio, has raised alarms due to its lack of congressional oversight, prompting questions about transparency and accountability in government spending. Lawmakers expressed concerns that this could lead to unchecked executive power, undermining the role of Congress in foreign affairs.

Deputy Secretary Riggs was called upon to address these issues, emphasizing the need for a strategic approach that strengthens U.S. global leadership rather than undermining it. The call for collaboration between the State Department and Congress was underscored as essential for restoring the dignity of American diplomats and ensuring effective foreign policy.

As the meeting concluded, the discussions underscored a critical juncture for U.S. diplomacy. The potential cuts to the State Department's budget and the controversial funding proposals could have lasting implications for America's role on the world stage. Lawmakers are now faced with the challenge of balancing national interests with the need for a robust and transparent diplomatic strategy moving forward.