Senate debates uncertainty in veto process after attorney general's conflicting opinion

During the recent North Dakota Legislative Management meeting on July 11, 2025, lawmakers expressed significant concerns regarding the implications of a recent attorney general's opinion on the governor's veto powers. The discussion highlighted fears that the opinion could set a dangerous precedent, allowing the governor and attorney general to redefine the scope of vetoes, potentially undermining the legislative assembly's authority.

Key points raised included the ambiguity surrounding the veto process, particularly regarding a specific veto related to Senate Bill 2014. The attorney general's opinion clarified that the vetoed amount was $10 million, not the $9.85 million that the governor's office intended to distribute. This discrepancy has raised alarms among legislators about the potential for future conflicts between the governor's office and the attorney general's interpretations of vetoes.

Senator Sorvag emphasized that without a definitive resolution, such as a Supreme Court ruling, the issues surrounding veto definitions may resurface, complicating future legislative actions. He noted that a special session to override the veto would only serve as a temporary fix, failing to address the broader concerns about the clarity and authority of veto powers.

The meeting underscored the need for a clear understanding of the veto process to ensure legislative integrity and prevent future disputes. As lawmakers consider their next steps, the implications of this discussion could shape the legislative landscape in North Dakota moving forward.