Richmond residents oppose Cultural Heritage Stewardship Plan amid housing crisis concerns

The Richmond City Planning Commission meeting on July 11, 2025, focused on the proposed Cultural Heritage Stewardship Plan, which has sparked significant debate regarding its implications for housing affordability and development in the city. Public comments highlighted concerns from various stakeholders, including community groups and real estate professionals, who expressed opposition to the plan in its current form.

Representatives from RVA YIMB, a local community organization, voiced strong objections, arguing that the plan could exacerbate housing affordability issues and hinder inclusive growth. They cited research indicating that historic district designations often lead to increased property values and housing costs, which can accelerate gentrification and deepen segregation. The group urged the city to conduct an equity and housing impact analysis before moving forward, emphasizing the need for preservation policies that align with housing and racial justice goals.

Samantha Kenny, a director at the Richmond Association of Realtors, echoed these concerns, stressing that the timing of the plan's advancement could conflict with ongoing zoning code reforms aimed at increasing housing production. She called for a delay in voting on the plan until the zoning rewrite is completed, arguing that the current proposals could unintentionally restrict housing development.

In contrast, supporters of the plan, including Sian Crump from Historic Richmond, defended its intentions, stating that it aims to protect the city's historic assets while providing incentives for property owners. Crump emphasized that the plan is not regulatory and does not impose restrictions on new housing development. Instead, it offers a framework for discussion and potential incentives to assist homeowners in maintaining their properties.

The meeting also highlighted the need for clearer public engagement, as many community members were unable to attend due to a lack of communication regarding public comment opportunities. As the commission considers the feedback received, the future of the Cultural Heritage Stewardship Plan remains uncertain, with calls for a balanced approach that prioritizes both preservation and housing accessibility.