City Council debates public outreach for proposed council size reduction

In the heart of Billings, city council members gathered for a work session on July 7, 2025, to discuss a pivotal proposal that could reshape the structure of local governance. The atmosphere was charged with urgency as council members grappled with the implications of potentially reducing the size of the council, a move that has sparked both interest and concern among residents.

As discussions unfolded, council member Aspen Leiter voiced apprehensions about the pace of the decision-making process. "It feels rushed," he remarked, emphasizing the need for thorough public engagement before any vote. His call for a more deliberate approach resonated with others who echoed the importance of community input, particularly regarding how changes might affect representation across the diverse neighborhoods of Billings.

The proposal at hand involves altering the council's composition, with suggestions ranging from maintaining the current structure to reducing the number of representatives. This has raised significant questions about how such changes would impact the representation of various demographics, especially the BIPOC community. Amy Aguirre, a candidate for Ward 3, shared insights from her informal polling, revealing a strong opposition among her peers to the proposed changes. "If we were to shrink the size of council, we'd have less representation of our very diverse community," she cautioned, highlighting the potential risks of diminishing voices at the decision-making table.

The council's deliberations also touched on the logistics of public outreach and education. Several members stressed the necessity of a robust campaign to inform residents about the proposed changes and gather their feedback. "We need to ensure the public understands the question being presented to them," one council member insisted, advocating for transparency and dialogue.

As the meeting progressed, the urgency to finalize a decision became palpable. Council members discussed the timeline for a potential vote, with some suggesting a vote on July 28. However, others expressed concern that rushing the process could lead to inadequate public understanding and support. "We need to summarize these conversations and talk amongst ourselves along with our constituents," one member proposed, suggesting a follow-up work session to ensure all voices are heard before moving forward.

The evening concluded with a sense of determination among council members to find a path that balances efficiency with community engagement. As they prepare for the next steps, the future of Billings' city council hangs in the balance, with the potential for significant changes that could redefine local governance for years to come. The council's commitment to involving the public in this critical conversation will be essential as they navigate the complexities of representation and community needs in the coming weeks.