Governor DeWine signs House Bill 96 with significant education budget changes

The Mentor Board of Education convened on July 10, 2025, to discuss significant updates regarding the district's budget and recent legislative changes impacting education funding. The meeting highlighted the implications of the state's newly signed two-year budget, which included 67 line-item vetoes by Governor Mike DeWine, marking a notable increase in his use of veto power.

One of the most pressing concerns addressed was the 40% cash balance carryover cap, which has raised alarms among local school boards. Additionally, the budget restricts local school boards from covering employee contributions to the state teachers' retirement system for superintendents and principals, and mandates that school board candidates run under partisan labels. These changes could significantly alter the landscape of local governance and funding for education.

The board also discussed the authority granted to county budget commissions to reduce voter-approved levy funds deemed excessive, a provision that could impact local funding for schools. The implications of these changes are immediate, with some provisions taking effect right away and others after a 90-day period.

In response to these developments, the General Assembly is set to reconvene on July 21 to consider overriding some of the vetoes, particularly those related to property taxes. This includes proposals that could further affect local funding mechanisms, raising concerns among board members about the potential for reduced financial support for schools.

Financial reports presented during the meeting indicated that the district closed the fiscal year with a revenue shortfall of approximately $129,000 compared to projections. Expenditures exceeded forecasts by $4.8 million, largely due to timing issues and increased special education costs. Despite these challenges, the district anticipates a better financial position moving forward, with an expected increase in revenue based on recent funding changes.

The meeting also touched on federal funding uncertainties, particularly regarding Title I and Title II allocations, which have been delayed. Board members expressed concerns about the potential impact on services for English learners and special education students, emphasizing the need for clarity on funding sources to ensure compliance with educational mandates.

Public participation included concerns about student safety at school events, highlighting the community's engagement in addressing issues that affect the school environment. The board's discussions reflect a broader commitment to navigating the complexities of educational funding and governance while prioritizing student needs.

As the board moves forward, the implications of the budgetary changes and legislative actions will be closely monitored, with further discussions anticipated in upcoming meetings. The community's involvement and advocacy for public education remain crucial as these developments unfold.