Dining in the dunes of Nantucket is stirring up debate as the Nantucket Conservation Commission grapples with jurisdictional questions surrounding this long-standing practice. During a recent meeting, representatives argued that dining in the dunes should not be subject to regulation under the Wetlands Protection Act or local bylaws, citing historical precedence dating back to the early 1970s.

Key proponents of this position presented affidavits from longtime island residents Tracy Root and John Shea, who confirmed that dining in the dunes has been a tradition since at least 1971. They assert that this activity is "grandfathered," meaning it predates the regulations that were enacted in 1972 and the 1980s, respectively.

To bolster their case, the commission received a supplemental report from coastal geologist Stan Humphreys. He argued that the dining activity complies with all performance standards set forth in the Wetlands Protection Act and local bylaws, asserting that there is no evidence of negative impact on the secondary dune. Humphreys, who participated in the meeting via phone, emphasized the negligible effect of dining on dune stability, further supporting the claim that this seasonal activity should continue unregulated.

As the commission deliberates, the outcome could set a significant precedent for how historical land use practices are treated under current environmental regulations. The discussions highlight the balance between preserving Nantucket's natural resources and honoring its cultural traditions. The commission's decision on this matter is eagerly anticipated, as it could influence future conservation efforts and community practices on the island.