California Assembly discusses AB 485 to combat wage theft in long-term care

The Senate Labor, Public Employment and Retirement Committee of the California State Senate convened on July 9, 2025, to discuss several significant legislative proposals aimed at improving labor relations and protecting workers' rights. The meeting featured a detailed examination of two key bills: AB 485, which addresses wage theft, and AB 1136, which provides protections for workers facing deportation.

The session began with a discussion on AB 485, which aims to enhance enforcement mechanisms against employers who fail to pay wage theft judgments. Proponents of the bill highlighted the need for stronger accountability measures, arguing that businesses that have been adjudicated for wage theft should not be allowed to operate without addressing their obligations to workers. The bill proposes that state agencies deny or renew licenses for employers with outstanding wage theft judgments, a move intended to incentivize compliance with labor laws. Supporters, including representatives from labor unions, emphasized the bill's potential to protect vulnerable workers and ensure fair treatment in the workplace.

Opposition to AB 485 emerged from representatives of nonprofit organizations and long-term care facilities, who expressed concerns about the potential unintended consequences of the bill. They argued that the strict enforcement measures could lead to the closure of essential services, thereby harming the very communities the bill aims to protect. The committee acknowledged these concerns and indicated a willingness to work on amendments to address the issues raised.

Following the discussion on wage theft, the committee turned its attention to AB 1136, which seeks to provide workers who have been wrongfully detained or deported by ICE with a grace period to manage their affairs and return to their jobs. The bill proposes allowing workers up to 12 months of unpaid leave in cases of deportation, with protections ensuring they can return to their previous positions. Amendments were discussed to alleviate employer concerns regarding displacement of employees, shifting the focus to offering the next available position based on seniority.

Throughout the meeting, committee members engaged in a robust dialogue about the implications of these bills, balancing the need for worker protections with the operational realities faced by employers. The discussions underscored the ongoing challenges in labor relations, particularly in the context of California's diverse workforce and the critical role of nonprofits in delivering essential services.

In conclusion, the committee voted to advance both bills for further consideration, reflecting a commitment to addressing labor issues while recognizing the complexities involved. The next steps will involve continued discussions and potential amendments to ensure that the legislation effectively serves the interests of both workers and employers in California.