Legislators push AB 367 to enhance fire hydrant readiness in Ventura County

A proposed bill aimed at improving fire hydrant reliability in Ventura County has sparked intense debate among local legislators and water agencies. Assembly Bill 367, introduced in response to devastating wildfires that have ravaged the area, seeks to ensure that fire hydrants remain operational during emergencies by implementing three key measures: maintaining adequate water tank levels during red flag warnings, providing backup generators for water systems, and reinforcing the structures housing these systems.

Assemblymember Bennett, a strong advocate for the bill, emphasized the urgent need for these changes, citing past incidents where fire hydrants failed to function due to depleted water supplies and power outages. "Residents of Ventura County want this," he stated, highlighting the community's demand for reliable firefighting resources. The bill has garnered support from local officials, including Kelly Brooks from the County of Ventura, who voiced backing for the initiative.

However, opposition has emerged from various water agencies, including the Association of California Water Agencies (AQUA), which represents approximately 470 public water agencies. Critics argue that the bill imposes significant financial burdens on local water suppliers without adequate state funding. They warn that the costs of implementing backup power systems and infrastructure upgrades could lead to steep rate increases for consumers. For instance, the city of Thousand Oaks estimates that compliance could require a $16 million investment, potentially resulting in a 47% hike in water rates.

Opponents also raised concerns about the bill's feasibility, citing the unrealistic timelines for compliance and the potential for increased litigation risks stemming from post-fire evaluations of water delivery systems. "This bill presents a costly and unrealistic mandate," stated Dane Hutchings, representing Thousand Oaks.

As discussions continue, the committee faces the challenge of balancing the urgent need for improved fire safety measures with the financial realities of local water agencies. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for future legislation, prompting further scrutiny and debate in the coming weeks.