The City Council of Palm Coast convened on July 1, 2025, to discuss several key agenda items, with a significant focus on the proposed amendments to the Unified Land Development Code regarding exterior colors of homes.

The meeting began with a second reading of Ordinance 2025, which aims to amend Chapter 13 of the city's code concerning exterior colors. City staff presented the recommended changes made since the last reading, inviting questions from council members. Vice Mayor expressed concerns about the ordinance, suggesting the need for a grace period for existing homes that do not comply with the new color regulations. He proposed an eight-year grace period for homeowners currently outside the approved color spectrum, arguing that the city should not dictate the colors of residents' homes.

The council engaged in a discussion about the implications of the ordinance, with some members expressing their opposition to the restrictions. One council member stated that the ordinance was unnecessary and restrictive, while another emphasized the importance of allowing homeowners more freedom in choosing their home colors. The conversation highlighted a divide among council members regarding the balance between community standards and individual expression.

Public comments followed, with numerous residents voicing their opinions on the color ordinance. Many expressed frustration over the restrictions, arguing that homeowners should have the right to paint their homes in colors of their choice, as long as they maintain the property. Residents shared personal anecdotes, emphasizing the emotional and financial stress associated with adhering to the current regulations. Several speakers called for the city to grandfather existing homes and eliminate the color restrictions altogether, citing the lack of evidence that home colors significantly impact property values.

The council concluded the public comment period without reaching a consensus on the proposed amendments. The discussion will likely continue in future meetings, as residents and council members alike seek a resolution that balances community aesthetics with individual homeowner rights. The next steps for the council remain to be determined as they navigate the complexities of this contentious issue.