California bill AB 347 empowers students to opt out of animal dissection in schools

The California State Senate Education Committee convened on July 2, 2025, to discuss Assembly Bill 347, which aims to enhance students' rights regarding animal dissection in educational settings. The bill seeks to ensure that students are informed of their right to opt out of dissection assignments and receive alternative assignments that achieve similar educational outcomes.

Currently, while students have the legal right to opt out of dissection, many are unaware of this option or fear repercussions, such as failing grades. AB 347 proposes to provide written notifications to students about their rights and the alternatives available, including synthetic models and digital simulations. These alternatives have gained traction, especially during the pandemic when traditional dissection was not feasible.

Supporters of the bill, including former students and representatives from animal rights organizations, argue that dissection is an outdated practice that can alienate compassionate students and does not align with modern educational standards. They emphasize that non-animal methods can be more effective in teaching anatomy and physiology, preparing students better for higher education.

Opponents of the bill, including representatives from educational supply companies, argue that existing laws already provide sufficient avenues for opting out and that the bill could impose additional costs on schools. They express concern that the bill may discourage hands-on learning experiences that are vital for developing critical thinking skills in STEM fields.

The committee heard testimonies from various stakeholders, including students who shared personal experiences of opting out of dissection and educators advocating for the bill. The discussion highlighted the ongoing debate over the role of animal dissection in education and the need for policies that respect students' rights while maintaining educational integrity.

As the committee deliberates on AB 347, the outcome could significantly impact how anatomy education is approached in California schools, balancing ethical considerations with educational practices.