Senate committee supports SB 48 to protect schools from ICE enforcement

July 02, 2025 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate committee supports SB 48 to protect schools from ICE enforcement
The Assembly Education Committee of the California State Assembly convened on July 2, 2025, to discuss significant educational legislation, particularly focusing on Senate Bill 48 (SB 48). The meeting featured key testimonies from various stakeholders, emphasizing the urgent need for protective measures in schools against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activities.

The session began with a warm welcome to Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurman, who expressed his support for SB 48. He highlighted the disruptions caused by ICE raids in communities, particularly their detrimental impact on school attendance and funding. Thurman urged the committee to pass the bill, which aims to establish schools as safe zones where ICE enforcement is prohibited unless a judicial warrant is presented.

Juan Ramirez, the executive vice president of the California Federation of Teachers (CFT), also spoke passionately in favor of the bill. Drawing from his extensive experience in education, he described the fear that immigrant families face, which leads to decreased student attendance and, consequently, reduced funding for schools. Ramirez emphasized the importance of creating safe learning environments where students can thrive without the fear of deportation.

The committee heard from numerous supporters of SB 48, including representatives from various educational and community organizations. They echoed the sentiments of Thurman and Ramirez, stressing the need for schools to remain free from ICE presence to ensure that all students feel secure and can focus on their education.

No opposition to the bill was noted during the meeting, indicating a strong consensus among committee members and public supporters regarding the necessity of SB 48. The committee is expected to take further action on the bill, with hopes of enacting it before the start of the upcoming school year.

In conclusion, the Assembly Education Committee's meeting underscored the critical need for legislative measures to protect students and schools from immigration enforcement, reflecting a broader commitment to fostering safe educational environments for all.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Family Portal
    Family Portal