Concerns over California's SB 18 dominated the Assembly Agriculture Committee meeting on July 2, 2025, as stakeholders voiced strong opposition to the bill's approach to addressing food insecurity. Critics argue that simply building grocery stores does not tackle the underlying issues of hunger, such as low wages and high food costs. They emphasized that without community input and accountability, taxpayer dollars could be wasted, potentially worsening the situation.

One prominent voice against the bill was a representative from the Native American Environmental Protection Coalition, who shared a compelling story from the Hoopa tribe. The speaker highlighted how the arrival of a large grocery chain led to the closure of local stores, leaving the community with limited options and inadequate employment opportunities. This experience underscored the need for solutions that prioritize community needs over corporate profits.

The coalition urged for amendments to SB 18 that would focus on community and tribal-led retail initiatives, support BIPOC-owned businesses, and ensure long-term commitments from grantees to remain engaged with the community. They stressed that the intent of the bill is not the issue, but rather the mechanisms proposed to achieve its goals.

Public comments reflected a similar sentiment, with various organizations expressing opposition unless the bill is amended to align with community needs. The committee members acknowledged the diverse challenges faced by different communities across the state, emphasizing the importance of tailored solutions to combat food insecurity.

As discussions continue, the future of SB 18 remains uncertain, with advocates calling for a more inclusive approach that genuinely addresses the root causes of food insecurity in California.