Airport negotiates new rental car regulations amid contract concerns and legislation changes

The St. Louis City Council's Transportation & Commerce Committee convened on July 1, 2025, to discuss significant changes affecting airport operations and commercial activities. A central focus of the meeting was the proposed Board Bill 25, which aims to alter existing regulations surrounding airport contracts, particularly those related to peer-to-peer car rental services like Turo.

The committee heard concerns from airport representatives about the potential disruptions caused by the proposed legislation. The lead negotiator for the airport emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in operational processes, especially as the airport is in the midst of negotiating a major contract for a new consolidated terminal. Disruptions in established procedures could jeopardize these negotiations and create uncertainty for airlines operating at the airport.

A key point of contention is the proposed changes to Title 18, which has governed airport contracts for decades. The airport officials argued that altering this foundational legislation could set a troubling precedent, allowing for future modifications based on individual contract disputes. They expressed concerns that if one party is dissatisfied with a contract, it could lead to further legislative changes, undermining the stability of airport operations.

The discussion also highlighted the distinction between peer-to-peer car rental services and traditional rental car companies. Airport representatives noted that 20 states have already recognized this difference in their regulations, and they urged the committee to consider this when drafting local legislation. The airport's revenue model, which relies on competitive bidding for contracts, could be adversely affected if the proposed bill mandates uniform fee structures across different types of rental services.

In response to public feedback regarding walkability and accessibility at the airport, officials indicated that they are committed to addressing these concerns without compromising existing regulations. They reiterated their willingness to negotiate and adapt the permitting process to better serve the community's needs.

As the committee continues to deliberate on Board Bill 25, the implications of these discussions will be closely monitored by both airport officials and the public. The outcome could significantly impact how commercial activities are conducted at the airport, shaping the future of transportation services in St. Louis.